Today, the 19th of
September,
1908, in the afternoon, the citizens of Veles - Bulgarians - gathered
at a
meeting and considered:
1. The question of
admitting
to the commission of the association 'Unity and Progress' an equal
number of
members - Turks and Bulgarians from the
2. The question of
handing the
church keys to the peasants from Starigrad, about which the Government
has done
nothing.
3. The question
concerning the
Serbian detachments' delay in laying down arms; Sava voivoda - the
'Boss' of
the Serbian revolutionary organization, has not surrendered; the
authorities
have been misled and, instead of the voivoda, the rebel Traiko has been
presented to the Turks, while Sava is still working underground,
intimidating
and molesting the Bulgarian people in the villages of Nezhilovo,
Papradishta,
Oreshe, Mokreni and elsewhere, and the whole of the 'Azot’.
4. The question about
the
threats addressed by the Serbian priest from Teovo to the peasants of
Novo
Selo; the answer of Enver Bey to this question: 'that the Serbians
shall be
forbidden to go to the Bulgarian villages and, if they disobey, they
shall be
prosecuted'.
5. The question about
the
church warden of the church in the
6. The question of
sending a
joint commission of Turks and Bulgarians for the inquiry. Nothing has
been done
yet.
7. Indirect threat by
Vassil
(a Serbian voivoda) through Resa Effendi not to allow the Metropolitan
bishop
to go to the
8. The key to the church
in
the Teovo village is still being kept by the Serbian rebels.
9. A policeman from the
Chashkar police station demanded that a peasant in the Kriva
Krousha village
give him brandy without payment and as the peasant refused, the
policeman
flogged him, tied him up and dragged him to the
Proceeding from the
above
items of the first meeting, 1
on which no action was taken, and the newly perpetrated
insults and abuses, the people decided:
1. To protest against
the
Serbian voivodas and rebels molesting the Bulgarian village population.
2. To protest against
the
local policy of the government of protecting and encouraging the
Serbian
propaganda.
3. To appeal to the
Minister
of Home Affairs, to the press, to the Buro of the
Union of the Constitutional Clubs and to the Young Turk
Committees in the town and in
Soloun.
If
this attitude were not peculiar and different in comparison with their
attitude
towards the other nationalities in the Empire, we would undoubtedly not
even
mention the name of the Bulgarian nationality to which we belong. Our
basic
principle is to struggle for the rights and liberties of all
nationalities,
without exception, and we strive for the complete equality of all the
subjects
of the
It
is of primary importance for us that the existing political system in
the
Empire should guarantee full political, economic and cultural equality
to all
nationalities, because only such a political situation can harmonize
their
feelings and their interests. Every deviation from this principle leads
to lack
of unity, national discord, and lack of harmony in the common ideals
and
aspirations of the people. To put a certain nationality in a
priviledged
position means nothing less than to support a system of political
inequality -
a system which creates only animosity among the different national
forces, and
this animosity and discord will in the end destroy the most valuable
contributions which these forces are capable of making to their common
homeland
through their peaceful and mutual development and progress.
We
have had more than one occasion to stress this idea, which is the basis
of our
political activity. We are against both privileges for and
discrimination (due
to lack of justice) against any nationality. Privileges only corrupt
the nation
which enjoys them and discrimination only embitters. As a result, such
inequality
provokes only passions and strife which can compromise the common
political
regime and the country supporting it. Since we profess these political
principles, we are convinced that no one will dare to accuse us either
of
chauvinism or of political separatism, when we are compelled to speak
about the
peculiar situation in which the Bulgarian nationality is at present
placed.
This can be observed everywhere daily. That the subject nationalities
in the
Empire have always been considered by the ruling circles to be inferior
to the
dominating nationality is a fact the truth of which we have never
doubted. In
this case, however, matters are rather different. Towards the Bulgarian
nationality the official authorities and all their agents have assumed
an
attitude very different from the one they have towards the other
nationalities,
especially in
'But',
the new rulers and statesmen might say, 'in principle, we have nothing
against
the equality of the nationalities and against an equal approach to them
on the
part of the authorities, but, as far as the Bulgarian nationality is
concerned,
matters are quite different. It is a power which is very dangerous for
us,
because it is in collusion with and inspired by
We
do not doubt that such were the general 'political' reasons of the
ruling
circles, even in the first days after the constitutional coup d'etat,
but they
received a particularly active practical expression a little later,
namely,
after the proclamation of the Bulgarian Independence and the breaking
off of
all treaty relations with
It
was then that the deviation of the government from 'the principle of
equality'
was felt, an equality against which the authorities have no objection
in
principle ... It is worthwhile arguing about this deviation, and not
because
the Turkish statesmen have any real reason to bear distrust and
contempt
towards the Bulgarian nationality, but because their 'political
reasonings' are
in this case based on a perverse evaluation of the situation, on a
false and
extremely wrong assessment of the conditions created by the new
developments,
and, because of the extraordinary regime under which the Bulgarian
nationality
has been placed by virtue of the above-mentioned reasonings, it is the
worst
possible choice of means for removing the existing, or temporary danger
of
future actions on the part of this nationality.
This
we shall prove and
support with facts next time.
And
so, the worst suspicion which the government and the state have about
the
Ottoman Bulgarians is that this nationality has close links with
official
Bulgaria, thus presenting a constant danger to the Empire, the
interests of
which do not coincide with the ultimate aims of the Bulgarian state. We
said
last time as well, that these considerations of the present Turkish
statesmen
have acquired a particularly great significance and weight since the
Act of
Turnovo with which the ruling circles in
In
the first place, the links with
There
is, however, no justification for the strange attitude of the
government
towards the Bulgarian nationality. What is more, this attitude will do
more
harm to
Today,
Jan. 15th, the citizens of Prilep gathered at a meeting, and taking
into
account:
1)
The numerous and systematic abuses of power in connection with the
electoral
law with the aim of infringing the rights of the Bulgarian population.
2)
Harassment by the Greek armed detachments in the region of Morihovo and
their
feverish activities to incite the Bulgarian patriarchists to fresh
disturbances.
3)
The action of the Serbian armed detachments in the North-East and
North-Western
parts of the district, designed to provoke fear in the Bulgarian
villages which
they conquered by terror during the former regime.
4)
The open resistance of the Serbian supporters who, incited by the
Serbian
detachments, do not allow the Bulgarian church commune to take actual
possession of the monasteries of Zurze and Slepche, which were awarded
to it by
a court decision.
5)
The illegal coversion of the convent of the Hilendar Monastery into a
Serbian
chapel.
6)
That the Bulgarian majority in the village of Vrubyani are not allowed
their
turn to hold services in the village church, which is in the possession
of the
Serbianized minority.
7)
The occupation of the Bulgarian school in the
8)
The complete indifference of the local authorities towards the various
arbitrary proceedings and infringements of the law committed by its
agents, in
spite of repeated complaints on the part of the population, and their
partiality in the new controversies over national problems aimed at
creating an
atmosphere of mutual animosity.
1)
To protest strongly to Parliament against the
various arbitrary proceedings and infringements of the
law.
2)
To demand of Parliament: a) the adoption of speedy and effective
measures to
paralyze the activities of the Serbian and Greek robber bands; b) a
just
solution of the church and school question; c) an end to the present
policy of
fanning national animosities.
3)
The meeting authorized the bureau to telegraph this resolution to the
Chairman
of the Ottoman Parliament and to send copies to Mr. P. Dorev and
Abdulah Azmi
Efendi, M.P. for Kutahya, and to publish it in the press.
From
the Bureau of the Meeting
The
Bulgarian citizens of the district of Bitolya gathered at a meeting, of
more
than 8,000, after listening to the speeches of the speakers and taking
into
account:
1)
That the Constitution has established equality and fraternity among
Ottoman
citizens.
2)
That on July 11th freedom of conscience and religion was proclaimed.
3)
That in the villages on Dihovo, Klabouchishta, Novatsi and Sredno Egri,
where
the majority of the population is Bulgarian, the latter declared its
desire to
join the Exarchate 5 months ago and has led a legal struggle for its
sacred
right to religious freedom ever since.
4)
That in spite of this declaration and struggle, the churches and the
schools in
Klabouchishta, Novatsi and Sredno Egri remain closed and in Dihovo, the
Bulgarian Patriarchists comprising 15 households as against 50
Exarchist
households are using the church and the school for themselves, while
the great
majority, with two houses and a school at the disposal of the
commune, are
compelled to educate their children in a private house and have no
admission to
their graveyard.
5)
That the prosperity and progress of the country require peace, justice
and
truth,
To
beseech the Parliament in Constantinople most earnestly to take up and
inquire
carefully into the particulars of the church question and to satisfy
the desire
of our people as soon as possible, by settling this question in the
spirit of
the Constitution - equality and fraternity, by giving the people the
right to
be the masters of the churches which they themselves have built and
maintained.
From
the Bureau of the Meeting
Chairman
of the
Kostour:
Ilarion
The
Church of St Constantine and St Hellen, which for 25 years had been in
the
hands of the Bulgarians of the village of Embore, with 200 households
of
Bulgarian Exarchists and 20 Patriarchist households, was forcedly
seized from
the Bulgarians by the Greek bishop of Lerin and the governor of Lerin 8
years
ago and was handed over to the 20 Graecomane households.
The
village of Paleor has about 80 Exarchist households and 30 Graecomane
households; the latter have the right to conduct their services 3 times
a month
in the only village church, while the Exarchists are allowed to do so
only
twice a month. This is a gross injustice towards the Bulgarians.
The
population of the villages of Doroutovo and Asankyoy, being Bulgarians,
wanted
to hear their own Bulgarian language in the churches and schools, but
the
governor of Kailyare would not allow them to.
Chairman
of the Commune: Papa Georgi
We
beg you, on behalf of 18 families of Bulgarian Exarchists, to allow us
to
obtain that part of the village school which is due to us, and to
permit us to
conduct services in the church, in turn with the 17 families of
Patriarchists,
to whom the government has given sole use of the church, built with the
money
of the whole population of the village.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population of the
On
behalf of 10 families of Bulgarian Exarchists, we beg to be given that
part of
the village school which is due to us, and to be permitted to conduct
services
in turn in the village church, which was built with the money of the
whole
population of the village, and which the government has handed over
entirely to
13 Patriarchist families.
On
behalf of the Bulgarians of the
Mayor:
Dime Georgi
We
beg you, on behalf of 15 families of Bulgarian Exarchists, to allow us
to
obtain that part of the village school due to us, and to permit us to
conduct
services in turn in the church which was built with the money of all
the
villagers, and which was handed over, under the old regime, to 19
families of
Patriarchists.
On
behalf of the Bulgarians in Chohalari Alexo Traikov
The
church of St. Peter and the Holy Trinity, built during the time of
Ahmed Pasha
— vali of Bitolya, with the efforts and the donations of the Exarchist
population of Kroushovo and its neighbourhood, and for the building of
which
the Bulgarians themselves obtained the necessary permission, granted on
the
name of the Bulgarian church warden, has been closed for the last 15
years
after being used for a very short period, owing to the instigations and
slanders of the Greeks, and is in danger of collapse.
That
the above-mentioned church belongs to the Bulgarians can be very easily
ascertained by any inquiry commission. For this reason, we beg you on behalf of the whole
population, to open the church and to hand it over to us, as its lawful
owners.
The
Government, ignoring our rights, as the majority, to the disputed
From
the Bulgarian Constitutional Club
Our
village, consisting of 156 Bulgarian and 152 Graecomane houses, has
only one
church. The Graecomanes, taking advantage of the arbitrary proceedings
of the
old regime, misappropriated the church and today still consider it
to be their
property. As the time of robberies has now passed, we beg you to take
the most
just measures for settlement of this question, thus contributing
to the
prosperity of our state.
Our
village has 80 Bulgarian houses and 60 Graecomane houses; also two
churches and
one school. The Graecomanes, taking advantage of the arbitrary
proceedings of
the old regime, usurped the church and the school and still have
possession of
them. As the time of arbitrary actions has now passed, we beg you to
investigate this question and to take the most just decision as becomes
a
constitutional administration.
Mayor:
Atanas Member: Atanas Member: Krusto
Our
village consisting of 105 Bulgarian and 55 Graecomane houses has only
one
school and one church. The Graecomanes, enjoying the favour of the
officials
under the despotic regime, infringed the law and appropriated the
church and
the school, which even now they consider their property. As the time of
the
arbitrary actions has now passed, we beg you to take measures for the
settlement of this question, as becomes a constitutional government.
Sealed
with the village seal
Our
village consisting of 150 Bulgarian and 45 Graecomane houses has only
one
school and one church. The Graecomanes, enjoying the favour of the
officials
under the despotic regime, broke the law and appropriated the school
and the
church. As the time of robbery has now passed, we beg you to take the
most just
measures for the settlement of this question, as becomes a
constitutional
government.
Sealed
with 6 village seals
In
Strumitsa, there are two churches which, although built with the help
of the
whole local Christian population, are now in the hands of the Greeks.
Under the
despotic regime, when there was a complete absence of rights we made
several
attempts to have at least one of these returned to us and, in spite of
the
Decree of the Ministry of Justice and Religions of December 12th, 1324
(1908),
sent to the Exarchate, which ordered the handing over to the Bulgarians
of the
site near the ruins of the old Metropolitan building, which had been
bought by
them for 350 Turkish liras for the purpose of building a church there ~
this
decree was never put into action. Thus, while the Greeks have three
churches,
the Bulgarians are totally deprived of a house of prayer. Is this right?
We
appeal to the feelings of justice of all the members of Parliament that
they
satisfy the lawful demands of the Bulgarians, who are deprived of a
house of
prayer.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population in Strumitsa
Treasurer:
Pandeli
The
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population in the
Twenty
years ago, with the necessary permission and help of the Holy
Exarchate, a
Bulgarian school was built in the
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population of Lounovo:
Priest
Ango
The
There
are two churches in our village - one of them is worth 1000 and the
other - 100
Turkish liras. The government, apart from giving orders for the large
church to
be given exclusively to the Serbs, also gave orders for the Serbs to
hold their
services in the small church as well, for two weeks in succession, and
the
Bulgarians - only one. Because this is a gross injustice towards the
Bulgarian
population, we beg you to send the necessary orders and have one of the
two
churches given to us for the observance of our religious rites.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population of the
Twenty-one
years ago the church, the school, and the garden, with all their
outbuildings,
etc., belonging to the whole Christian population of the town of
Doiran, were
handed over, without any special permission, to the Greek church
commune,
representing only 150 Graecomane households. And the unfortunate
Bulgarian
population, numbering more than 400 households, is compelled to
conduct its
religious rites in a dilapidated house serving as a chapel. After the
declaration and the guarantee of human rights: equality, fraternity and
justice
for all, and relying on the stipulations of the Constitution, we beg
the
respected Parliament to order the return of that part of the
above-mentioned
usurped property which is due to us according to the law.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population in Doiran:
Mayor
Mito
The
despotic government ordered the church and the school in our village,
built by
our forefathers, to be handed over to the Graecomanes, while the
Bulgarian
population, consisting of more than 50 households, was deprived of the
right to
conduct its religious rites. Because, with the proclamation of the
Constitution, we were granted liberty and justice, we beg the respected
government
to restore our rights over the said church and school.
On
behalf of the population:
Mayor
Kolyo
Our
Mayor
Hristo
Of
the 198 houses in our little town 190 are Bulgarian, 7 are Serbian and
only one
is Graecomane. Apart from these, there are about 21 families of
Wallachian
settlers. The government of the former despotic regime seized our
church by
force and gave it to the Patriarchists, although it was built by us
Bulgarians,
and was also used by the population of the neighbouring villages of
Rashtane,
Serbyani and Osoi, which have about 120 houses altogether. With the
taking of
the church, 310 families were deprived of the possibility of praying to
God.
The despotic government paid no attention to any of our complaints
against this
gross injustice. But now with the proclamation of the Constitution
which is the
sole guarantee of the prosperity of all the nationalities bearing the
name of
Ottomans, and with the opening of Parliament which intends to put an
end to the
intolerable situation of all the oppressed people, the eyes of everyone
are
turned to that holy institution, the Parliament, which will legalize
justice,
thus opening the way to the prosperity of this country which has
suffered so
much.
On
behalf of the population of the Varosh quarter (Kichevo): Mayors: G.
Yakimov
and P. Apostolov
It
can be proved with historical data that the Monastery of St Nahum,
situated on
the Northern shore of the
On
behalf of the whole Bulgarian population in the town of
Having
had no freedom of religion and education during the despotic regime, on
the
proclamation of the Constitution and the triumph of freedom, the
Bulgarian
element broke away from the Patriarchate, and there awoke within it a
feeling
of religious independence. We beg that the church and the school which
were
bequeathed to us by our grandparents and great-grandparents be returned
to us,
because we are the majority. Explanations by post.
On
behalf of 127 Bulgarian households in the
Iliya
Konstantinov
Although
there are 350 households of Bulgarian Exarchists and only 300
Graecomane
households in our town, the town church and school are in the hands of
the
Graecomanes who seized them 30 years ago, and the Bulgarians are
excluded from
the town church and school. Although we, the tormented Bulgarian
population,
have made many representations to the proper authorities, and, the last
time (4
months ago), we even wrote to the Great Vizir himself, none of our
requests
have been granted. As it is the purpose of Parliament to guarantee
the rights
of the citizens, we expect a speedy and just settlement of the
question.
In
spite of the fact that there are 50 households of Bulgarian Exarchists
and only
20 Graecomane households, the village church and school have been in
the hands
of the Graecomanes for 30 years, and we, the Bulgarians, have been
deprived of
a house of prayer and a school. Although we, the tormented Bulgarian
population, have made many representations to the proper authorities,
our
requests have not been granted. As it is the purpose of Parliament to
guarantee
the rights of the citizens, we expect a speedy and just settlement of
this
question.
Mayor
Ivan Kamchev
In
spite of the fact that there are in the village 79 households of
Bulgarian
Exarchists and only 39 households of Graecomane-Patriarchists, the
village
church and school, although village property, have been seized by the
Graecomanes and we are forbidden to use them. Although we, the
tormented
Bulgarian population, have made many representations to the proper
authorities,
our requests have not been granted. We expect a speedy and just
settlement of
the question by Parliament, whose task it is to guarantee the rights of
the
citizens.
Mayor
Risto Georgiev
Our
village church, built by our grandparents and great-grandparents and
intended
to serve as a house of prayer for the whole village, as well as our
village
school, have for the last 32 years been appropriated by 13 households
of
Graecomane-Patriarchists, and we, the Bulgarians, although we are 137
households, or 685 people, are deprived of a house of prayer and of
school
premises where we can educate our children. Although we have made many
representations nothing has come of any of them. We, the Bulgarians,
who have been
always underprivileged, rely on Parliament, which is authorized to
protect the
liberty and the rights of the people, and we are humbly expecting a
just
settlement of the question.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population in the
Our
village consists of 50 Bulgarian houses. We have used the church turn
and turn
about with the Graecomanes ever since the time of the despotic regime,
but the
school is entirely in the hands of the Graecomanes, although the
Patriarchate
did not give a brass farthing for the building of the church and the
school;
they were built with the money from the population and the vakif
property. We
beg, on behalf of the entire Bulgarian population, and in the name of
justice
and equality, that taking into consideration the ratio between the
populations,
the use of the village church should be according to that ratio, and
that the
school should be given entirely into the hands of the Bulgarians.
Mayor:
Koli Markov
There
are 18 Bulgarian and 12 Graecomane houses in our village. The church
and the
school are entirely in the hands of the Graecomanes. Because they were
built
jointly by the whole population of the village, we beg you to hand over
to us
those parts of them which are due to us.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population in the farm of Davidovo:
Mayor:
Georgi Petrev
The
village school, and the church, used as a house of prayer by our
grandparents
and great-grandparents, were seized 32 years ago by the Graecomanes,
who have
only 130 houses out of the total of 350 houses in the village, and we
are
forbidden to listen to the service in the church or to educate our
children at the
school. After making several requests which have not been granted, the
wronged
population is relying on Parliament which is authorized to defend the
laws and
the rights of citizens, and is humbly expecting its just orders.
Mayor
Kostantin
Thirty-four
years ago, some of the Bulgarians, hoping to save themselves from the
tyranny
of the Greek bishop and relying on the consuls of the Great Powers for
protection, became Papists, but then, perceiving that they would have
no
benefit from this, they again acknowledged the supremacy of the
Exarchate. The
Catholic bishop managed, through bribes, to draw 20 families over to
his side.
These families seized our church and vakifs, which had been bequeathed
to us by
our fathers and grandfathers. In the hope that we would be able to get
our
church back, we made representations to the local governor and the
vilayet
authorities for six years, but unfortunately, our requests were not
granted. The
despairing population broke into
We
are eagerly expecting justice from the representatives of the people.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population in the town of
The
The
whole Christian population of our village is of Bulgarian nationality
and has
spoken Bulgarian from time immemorial. In spite of this, however, until
the proclamation
of the Constitution it was compelled to use the services of Greek
priests and
teachers in its church and school. After the Constitution was
proclaimed, the
whole population, inspired by a desire to preserve its native language,
and
deeply convinced that it should pray and study in Bulgarian, decided
unanimously to acknowledge the spiritual jurisdiction of the Bulgarian
Exarchate and, for this purpose, asked the chairman of the Bulgarian
church
commune in Syar to send us a priest and a teacher of Bulgarian
nationality. All
this was officially announced to the myutesarif of Syar. The church
commune of
Syar sent us a Bulgarian teacher and a priest, who were welcomed with
joy and
rapture by the entire population. But, on December 18th last year, the
Greek
bishop of Syar, without being invited, came to our village, and having
deceived
and won over five peasants, opened the church by force and
conducted a service
there in the presence of only those five peasants. Then he took the
keys of the
church and the school, gave them to the five Graecomanes, and went to
the
In this way our church
and school,
built with the money of our forefathers, were delivered into the hands
of only
five Graecomanes, while 50 Bulgarian households are without a house of
prayer
and their children -without education. The whole village had been
united and
used the church and the school together, but the arrival of the bishop
caused
discord and now 50 families have been deprived of their church and
school.
Under the old regime such a thing was easy to understand, but now that
the
Constitution guarantees full freedom of conscience, such a thing is
unjust and
illegal. An inquiry can easily prove the truth of our words. For this
reason,
we beg you to inquire into the case, and to give us the right to use
our native
Bulgarian language in our church and school, and to forbid the Greek
bishop to
come and cause discord by his arbitrary actions.
On
behalf of the whole population of the village of Mekesh (district of
Syar)
Mayor:
the village seal Member: Stoil
Apostolov Member: Tasho Popov
On
behalf of the Bulgarian Commune in Elshani:
Mayor:
the village seal
Members: D.
Stoyanov and K. Georgiev
The
whole Christian population of our village is of Bulgarian nationality
and has
spoken Bulgarian from time immemorial. In spite of this, it is
compelled to
use Greek priests and teachers, because various slanders on the pan of
the
Greek bishops have prevented us from introducing the Bulgarian
language. After
the proclamation of the Constitution, the whole population, inspired by
a
desire to preserve its native language, and deeply convinced that it
should
pray and study in Bulgarian, unanimously acknowledged the supremacy of
the
Bulgarian Exarchate, and begged the Bulgarian church commune in Syar to
send us
a priest and a teacher of Bulgarian origin. At the same time the
myutesarif of
Syar was officially informed. The Bulgarian commune in Syar sent us a
priest
and a teacher, who were heartily welcomed by the whole population.
But then,
the hateful Greek bishop of Syar came to our village without being
invited, and
managed to deceive and win over some ignorant peasants, and gave them
the keys
of our church and school. Resolving not to deprive our children of
education
and ourselves of a house of prayer, we hired a private house for use as
a
temporary chapel and school, but even this appeared too much to our
enemies and
the house was closed on the order of the authorities.
And,
besides ourselves, 270 households in the villages of Agomahala,
Joumalar,
Kuzpike and
In
this way, our church and school, built with the money of our
forefathers, have
been delivered into the hands of five Graecomanes, while five Bulgarian
villages have been deprived of their church and school. Under the old
regime,
this injustice could be easily explained, but now that the Constitution
guarantees full freedom of conscience, this situation must no longer be
tolerated.
For
this reason, we beg you to investigate our case and give us the right
to pray
in our church and study at our school in our native language and to
forbid the
Greek bishop to come to our village and cause discord among the
Christian
population.
January
12th, 1909
The
church and the school of our village have been handed over by the
government to
40 households, subordinated to the Patriarchate, and, we who are 80
households,
have no place for religious rites and for the education of our
children. We
earnestly beg you to settle this question in a satisfactory way.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population in the
Mayor:
Nikola
There
are 21 Bulgarian houses and only 10 Graecomane houses in our village.
Until 25
days ago we conducted our religious rites in the village church, but
two weeks
ago the government took the church from us and gave it to the
Graecomanes,
although they are a minority, and, after they had used the church for
about 15
days, it was closed and it is still closed. We beg you to take the
necessary
steps for the opening of the church.
On
behalf of the whole Bulgarian population:
Mayor:
Milcho Member: Andon
Although
the whole population of our village is of Bulgarian origin our church
and
school have been closed for the last 4 years. We don't know the reason
for
this. We beg you to give the necessary orders for them to be reopened.
On
behalf of the population:
Mayor:
Ivan Member:
Gono
There
are 240 houses in our village, of which 10 are Patriarchist and 230 are
Exarchist. Our village church and school were built under the old
regime, with
the help of the poor population, but today, under the Constitutional
regime,
they are closed, although we, the Bulgarians, being Exarchists, have
paid our
taxes regularly for the last 10 years. The other ten houses belong to
people of
Bulgarian origin, who call themselves Graecomanes, only because they
are under
the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate, and, although they did not help
in the
least over the building of the church, they continue to use the church
and the
school, where only 5-6 of their children study, while we, the
Bulgarians, 230
households, appeal first to God and secondly to the members of
Parliament, as
true patriots, to inquire into this case and put an end to such
injustices,
which may drive us to despair.
On behalf of the population of the
Mayor:
Kolyo Mitre
Owing
to slanders made by 7 Graecomane Patriarchist households, our village
church
and school are closed, although we, the Bulgarian Exarchists, number
150
households. We beg you to give orders for the opening of our church and
school,
so that we shall not be without a house of prayer and so that we shall
save our
children from loitering about in the streets.
On
behalf of the Bulgarian population:
Mayor:
Tano Member: Petre
Edinstvo and Constitoutsionna Zarya
had only
provisional tasks, the most important of which was to help the
Bulgarians in
the Empire to orientate their social and political thought amidst the
sudden
changes in the internal life of the country; to propagate the new ways
of
thought and new forms of struggle made necessary by the changes, to
point out
the need to organize Ottoman democratic parties and to raise their
common
slogans. This aim has been achieved. In the ranks of the Bulgarian
element the
organization of democratic forces is already taking place. On the one
hand, we
observe the speedy growth of the Bulgarian People's Federal Party
(BPFP) and,
on the other, the first beginnings of the Workers' Party.
The
need for the further concentration of the forces around the two party
groupings, the need for purely party newspapers, led to the appearance
of Narodna
Volya as a Party organ of the BPFP which is already in formation,
and the
newspaper Rabotnik, which will soon begin to appear as the
theoretical
organ of the Workers' Party (WP).
To
disseminate the ideas of our party and to defend our positions - this
will be
our daily task. In this article, however, we want to set forth the
general
outlines of these positions and ideas.
As
an organ of the BPFP, Narodna Volya defends and expresses the
interests
mainly of that part of the Bulgarian population, which comprises its
predominant
majority, and which is the most important element in that party -the
petty
owners deprived of all state protection, the landless or poor farmers,
petty
shopkeepers, craftsmen and merchants. These are the social strata whose
interests today are the interests of the Bulgarian nationality in the
Empire.
We
consider that these interests require, in the first place, the
strengthening of
the constitutional regime, the expansion of liberties and the extension
of
reforms in the administrative and economic system. Only in this way can
we
create conditions for the raising of the standard of living and the
prosperity
of the Bulgarians in the Empire.
But
the expansion of liberties and reforms can be guaranteed and realized
only by
organizing of those strata of society which are most concerned - not
only among
the Bulgarian population, but among all the nationalities in the
Empire, the
interests of which are identical - in joint Ottoman democratic
parties on
federal basis. Only parties which rely on the above-mentioned strata,
and,
above all, on the revolutionary ones, can be sufficiently strong to
impose
their interests upon the external and the internal policy of the state:
interests which coincide with the general cultural development of the
country.
The
power of reaction and the greatest obstacle to progress in the country
today,
as under the old regime, lies in the animosities among the
nationalities and
the divisions among the democratic forces. Since we regard the
organizing of
these forces as of paramount importance even to purely national
Bulgarian
interests, we consider as equally reactionary both the actions and the
encroachment
of the conservative internal factors which obviously seek to stop the
progress
of reform as well as all actions - from whatever direction - which
create
animosity and suspicion among the nations. We also consider as
reactionary all
those actions which, as their primary object, seek to compromise the
present
regime in the eyes of the national minorities - the Bulgarian, for
example -
and, on the basis of discontent and distrust of this regime seek to
preserve
their false hopes in external factors, thus making these minorities
tools of
the external propaganda conducted by the court camarillas in Athens,
Sofia and
Belgrade. These actions are reactionary, not only because they create
discord
and animosity among the nations in the Empire, but also because they
drive the
Moslem populations to the side of the conservative forces, and
encourage the
minorities to remain passive as regards internal politics. Narodna
Volya
will fight against conservative forces and reaction from within, and
against
reaction from without - propaganda from all sources.
Convinced
that the prosperity of every nation within the Empire lies in the
prosperity of
the entire Ottoman people, which prosperity can be achieved only by
coordinating the separate efforts of the democratic elements of all the
nations, we put forward these general demands in support of which the
great
majority of the Bulgarian people in the Empire will soon rally to form
a party,
which, in turn, will later become an integral part of the General
Federal
People's Party.
The
most important economic demands which we raise are: to supply the
landless and
the poor farmers with land; to raise the people's standard of living by
creating a credit system accessible to all; to build suitable and
inexpensive
communications, to provide technical and economic education.
Our
general political demands are: to introduce widely the principle of
sovereignty
of the people by universal, direct, secret and proportionate
suffrage; to
ensure freedom of the press, of organization, of assembly and of
protest.
The national question is
for us a
question of democracy and it has to be solved by the internal social
forces.
That is why, in connection with this question too, we are raising
demands
which will unite rather than split the democratic forces of the
different
nationalities. As the most urgent demand we are insisting on an
expansion of
the self-government by the communes, the districts and the
vilayets.
Concerning education, our demands are that it should be conducted in
the native
language of the pupils; it should be under the general control of the
state and
should be governed by central bodies, elevated by each nation; every
national
department in the general Ministry of Education should have at its
disposal the
taxes collected for educational purposes from their respective nations;
the
existing spiritual institutions which are based on purely monarchic
principles
and are entirely in the service of various kinds of national
propaganda, should
deal with spiritual matters only, and education should be Put under the
direct
control of the people.
We
see the unification of the Bulgarian nationality and its cultural
development
not in the annexation of parts of the Empire to Bulgaria, nor in the
ruin of
any of its neighbouring states, nor of any of the nationalities within
the
Empire, but, on the contrary, we see it only in their common prosperity
and
fraternity, which can be achieved through the implementation of the
idea of an
Eastern Federation.
Proceeding
from these premises, Narodna Volya will fight against every
policy, -
whatever its origin - which brings discord and creates gulfs between
the small
states in the Balkans and the Empire.
Up till now the
Macedonian
revolutionary movement has not been able to rely on its own forces in
the
struggle against absolutism for reasons that are well-known. That is
why it
relied mainly on so-called 'foreign' intervention. To provoke this
'foreign'
intervention - this was the main task of the movement.
What this foreign
intervention
brought us is well known to all Ottoman Bulgarians, as well as to the
whole
interested world. But, however small the advantages of the foreign
support
might have been, still the Macedonian population could not reject
it because
it could see no better way out of the desperate situation. The national
character of Turkish absolutism, the inevitable and, in most cases,
artificially fanned national discord, the endeavours of the Ottoman
Bulgarians
to unite their nation - these and many other reasons created before the
eyes of
the Macedonian movement an impenetrable wall which did not allow it to
observe
the realities of life. The idea of autonomy for
The proclamation of the
Constitution could not put an end to this lack of unity. A large part
of the
Bulgarian population has still its old disbelief in the development of
its own
homeland. This can be explained partly by the force of tradition, and
partly by
the inadequate improvements. In this respect no small part was played
by the
false propaganda of the Bulgarian Constitutional Clubs. When they first
came
into being these clubs declared that they based themselves on the
Constitution,
and that their main task would be to contribute to their strengthening
and
expansion.
But this was just a
formal
position. In fact, the Constitutional Clubs, at the bottom of their
hearts,
still keep their old distrust of constitutional reforms. For this
reason, they
could not become a really significant force for the development of
democracy,
which alone provides conditions under which the Bulgarian element as
well
would, together with the other nationalities, be able to feel free and
equal.
They probably said to themselves: 'We shall wait and see what the
"Young
Turk" Revolution will bring us.' And they waited at a time when it was
necessary to work with all their strength for the organization of those
forces
which alone could make the Constitution a reality. To see what the
others will
give us! This could be said only by a man, who relies on what the
others will
give him, instead of winning his rights through his own efforts and
struggles.
And such are the people around the Constitutional Clubs. Being for the
most
part foreign agents, they have neither the desire, nor the interest, to
show
the Bulgarian people in the Empire that the Bulgarians there should not
rely on
others, as they have done until now, but that they too, like the other
nations
eager to achieve equality and justice, should take the responsibility
for what
has been won and what remains to be won. But they are not doing it
because they
know that if they say 'A' they will have to say 'B' as well, i.e. if
they teach
the people to rely on their own strength, they will not be able to
avoid a
confederation of all freedom-loving forces in the Empire. And this is
contrary
to the interests of the Bulgarian pseudo-patriots. It is much more in
their interests
to prove that only the Bulgarians are unjustly treated. To say that out
of 38
million Ottoman citizens only one million Bulgarian-Exarchists are
unjustly
treated! And this agitation of theirs obviously aims at keeping the
Bulgarian
population in an isolated state in order to enable some dirty hands to
use
them.
It is true that not
everything
has been given to the people, to the entire Ottoman people, and
hence to the
Bulgarian element. It is also true that the legal struggle must not
stop for a
long time ahead. But between the real struggle for equality and
liberty, on the
one hand, and the 'waiting' of the Constitutional Clubs, on the other
hand,
there is a wide gap. This 'waiting' is the complete negation of
struggle of
every kind. It can serve only to create a certain mood, as those
clubmen are
doing. Their final conclusion is that we have been given nothing.
What then should be
done,
gentlemen of the Clubs? To this question you can give no answer
because, as
your 'struggle' has no beginning, it can have no end. Then we answer
thus: the
Ottoman Bulgarians united with all the democratic forces will continue
their
struggle collectively and they will not stop it until the complete
sovereignty
of our country is achieved, until serious guarantees are won for the
full
equality of all the nationalities and the common development and
prosperity of
the entire Ottoman people. And in this unceasing struggle of the
Ottoman
Bulgarians, together with the progressive and democratic elements of
all the
nationalities in the Empire, they will become an active political
power, which
will be able to defend with dignity both its specific interests and the
interests of the common cultural development of the country.
... Before starting my speech, I
should like
to convey my sincere congratulations to my honoured friend, Mr.
Habib, who, in
his speech, clearly described the true situation in the country. The
greatest
impediment on the road to complete success is the fact that we are more
concerned with memories from the past than with the future. A German
sage has
said: 'We have to forget the past if we want to go forward.' As far as
the
situation in
But I should like to
answer
some of the questions posed by the speakers before me. Mr. Bousho said
that
Now let us turn to the
problem
of the revolutionary organization in
Propaganda was also
mentioned.
Propaganda means: something nonexistent that has to be created.
While we, the
Ottoman Bulgarians, had representatives from Bitolya,
Let us turn to the
church
question. The churches belong neither to the Exarchate nor to the
Patriarchate,
but to the peasants with whose means and labour they were built. In the
event,
the Patriarchate and the Exarchate were a kind of proxy for the issuing
of the
necessary firmans. As my deceased tutor in Law, Ali Haidar Efendi, used
to say,
the source of the power of the proxy (vekillik) is in the authorizer.
If the
authorizer changes his mind, the authorized loses his prerogatives. Up
till now
the churches have been headed by a body elected by the peasants. I
should like
to ask a question: are the people made for the churches or are the
churches
made for the people? Is it possible for God's creatures to belong to
inanimate
objects? The latest achievements of culture stem from the fact that the
soul,
the mind, and all spiritual forces in general have power over natural
forces.
But let us leave these logical conclusions and come to the policy of
the
government from the 'sixties onward; it acknowledges the ownership of
the
peasants in these matters. What is more, the Bulgarian villages in the
districts of Odrin and Soloun which
became Catholic kept their churches and schools. Besides, this question
is not
a purely religious one, because if it were, that pillar of
Christianity, the
Patriarchate, instead of closing down the existing churches, would
build four
or five more in every village. This shows that the question is purely
social
and political. The government has proved incapable of coping with this
question
and tricked the people by saying that
Parliament will settle this question. If Parliament does not
settle it,
the population will become still more restive. I completely agree with
the
deputy Kozmidis, who demands first of all, justice from the government
and for
those that are not satisfied with this justice - compulsion. I
subscribe to
this totally. But this justice will not be as he desires and wants it
to be
medieval in character, but the way our honourable friend, Risa Tefik
Bey (the
deputy from Odrin) wants it, worthy of a modern constitutional state.
I am not an extremist. I
am
against all, be they Bulgarians or Greeks, who want to exploit this
question
and create disorder. I want it to be solved with justice and legally,
so that
we be able to consolidate the agreement and solidarity we have so
long
desired. At this moment, when the country needs peace, we must all show
moderation and make sacrifices for the welfare of the country. And he
who is
not satisfied with a just and modern settlement of this question, has
voluntarily rejected the Ottoman cause, which is based on liberty,
equality,
law and solidarity. You will agree that such stubborn and extremist
elements
are not true sons of this country (Applause), The private interests of
the
Patriarchate and the Exarchate should give way to common Ottoman
interests and
the interests of the population (Loud applause). We should not be
looking at
every problem through alien telescopes, but through Ottoman spectacles
(Applause). I find the Minister's declaration satisfactory and the
proposal for
creating a commission for inquiring into and settling this question
once and
for all timely (Loud and long applause).
... Better, more gifted, more
active and, in
general, better and more systematically organized than we after the
proclamation of this favourable Constitution, they managed to import
arms and
to complete the arming of the population. After that they sent to every
Bulgarian-speaking village, without exception, innumerable agents and
preachers
of the Bulgarian idea. The former leaders and members of their
revolutionary
organizations proved excellent in this respect. They have made and are
making
use of everything. I cannot disguise my surprise at the fact that,
after the
changes, they proved themselves to be well prepared for the new way of
activity
in which they excel. By threats, by tempting promises, by persuasion
and by
every kind of means they have succeeded in forming strong Bulgarian
parties in
the majority of Bulgarian-speaking villages where never before had
there been
any schism. And in spite of the fact that three villages came over to
our side
from the northern regions, we suffered losses after July 11th,
especially in
the plain of Syar. Reserving the right to send you a special report on
this
problem, by the first post, I shall now confine myself to stating
merely that
Bulgarian activity in my region takes the following forms: arming,
military
drilling and, in general, preparations for a forthcoming uprising in
the
northern, i.e., purely Bulgarian regions. At the same time, there is
vigorous,
constant, quiet, terrifying work for final predominance in the south
i.e. on
the plain of Syar. It could even be said that the entire attention
of the
Bulgarian cause is, at this moment, directed towards the south, so that
after
gaining final victory on the plain, it may surround, as in an iron
ring, the
city of Syar together with the five Greek-speaking villages around it,
similarly with the town of Djoumaya, so that later the Bulgarians can
come down
freely to the sea.
This
terrible work, directed and led from above (Sofia, Soloun and Bitolya)
according to the evidence which we have, i.e., letters giving orders to
the
leaders and the archpriests for actions which they have to carry out in
the
villages and which give rise to the petitions of the Bulgarophon
population to
the government on different questions (military duty, military levies,
schools,
churches, etc.) - all this colossal work now is being done quietly and
noiselessly. Almost no killing, no assaults, apart from some
insignificant
incidents limited to squibbles between different parties in the
villages and to
the seizure or attempts at seizing schools and churches, something
which is
more or less supported by the authorities. The leaders and the
revolutionaries
make the rounds of the villages and some of them are appointed as
teachers, the
constant collection of taxes from the peasants still continues,
those that do
not submit are punished, the Organization is supported, military drill
continues
and everything else as well, just as before the Constitution, and this
with the
knowledge and forbearance of the Turks and the government, who are
afraid to
persecute Bulgarians, nor do they even dare offend them. In actual
fact, in the
south there are no detachments except for the old revolutionaries, who,
armed
and untroubled, visit the villages and freely come on their lofty
and
peace-loving work , while with us it is just the opposite. In the north
there
are two or three detachments maintained by Sandanski to strengthen his
influence, to collect levies, drill the peasants, etc. The leader of
the
detachment at Melnik is a man named Tosho, who has fled from justice.
Besides
the detachments there are seven Bulgarian officers, disguised as
peasants, who
visit the villages and drill the peasants. In a fortified valley in the
The
Greek-speaking villages, as well as
those from the unmixed Greek
zone, and the city of Syar itself, are swarming with Bulgarians, who,
up till
July 11th, did not dare enter them, to their great regret, since they
could not
sell their goods nor work there, but now they fill the city without any
restrictions, not due to any need, but with a fixed aim. The
proclamation of
Bulgaria as a kingdom, its military preparations, the war threats and,
in
general, the attraction of Bulgarian bayonets have roused the
spirit, of the
Bulgarian population and have incited it to such an extent, that, when
Bulgarian peasants come with a petition to the myutesarif on any
problem, they
threaten him (it is incredible but true) that if their requests are not
granted, they will not come to the government again, but will go
elsewhere,
meaning Bulgaria. And this happens at a full meeting of the
government's
council at which, when our archpriest and deputy director (a Greek)
remarked on
the seriousness of the problem, the myutesarif replied that the
peasants were
simple people and did not know how to express themselves.
A few days
ago, the schism appeared in the Bulgarophone
The
appearance of a schism in Prosenik filled us with sorrow, because in
this way
all villages in this part of the plain, Eleshen, Kiipru, Koumli and now
Prosenik, have become mixed since the Constitution except, of course,
the farms
in the plain which are ours only in form and are really Bulgarian, and
have
become very fanatical after July 11th. Against these losses, we have in
the
plain only 25 families in the village of Ernikyoi (near Djoumaya), who
fled to
us together with their priest, six families in the village of Spatovo
and two
or three families in some other villages. As I have said many times,
the reason
for these losses after July 11th are the generous promises about the
distribution of the lands belonging to the beys, as well as promises of
posts,
titles and other public offices, on the part of the Bulgarian
government,,
which allegedly for this purpose, has placed its army on alert, etc.
Assurances
about an uprising, about an impending war and the coming of the
liberating
Bulgarian army, as well as other lies on the part of the agents of
Bulgarian
propaganda, have electrified the population and have persuaded the poor
elements to proclaim a schism, with the conviction that this will
improve their
lot. It should be repeated that the Bulgarian propaganda is full of
Socialist
ideas and, in the struggle against capital, private ownership and the
upper
classes (archbishops, notables, etc.) and easily wins over the broad
masses of
the population by linking the natural striving of the human being for
personal
interest with social and political strivings. It is another matter,
whether it
is possible to do serious work based on false promises. But it is a
fact that
important forces are being taken away from us, and we are falling
into a
difficult situation, the continuance of which is tantamount to the
failure of
our task in this part of the country.
Measures
for preventing this danger will be submitted in a special report to the King's Ministry.
... We shall not now discuss the
other parties
which are represented in Parliament. We would like now to say a few
things
about the Bulgarian parties which have been formed in
Today,
there are two main parties in
Here we
shall consider these two parties only in general lines, and another
time, if
necessary, we shall discuss them in detail. In essence, the two parties
express
the strivings of two different classes - the Bulgarian
Macedonian-Adrianople
Constitutional Party represents the interests of the merchants and
industrialists,
of the factory owners, and rich craftsmen who tomorrow will turn into
industrialists and wholesale merchants, of the contractors, the rich
peasants
and pawnbrokers, in brief, of the class which is called the urban or
bourgeois
class. As a party of a class, which is nationalistic, which wants to
unite
with its 'brothers' in
In
contrast, the Bulgarian Federal Party is the representative of the
petty
merchants, artisans and peasants, of the grocers and innkeepers, in
short, of
what is called the petty bourgeoisie. Thus, if the first is a bourgeois
party,
the second is a petty bourgeois party. The fact that the latter sides
with the
farm workers and with the poor peasants in general and stresses as a
special
point on its programme a demand for social reform, in the sense that
the
government should give land to these peasants - this fact does not in
itself
make it any better than a petty bourgeois party, which it is in
essence.
Because, first of all, it regards the problem of the social reform as a
means
of creating more petty owners, i.e. a more numerous petty bourgeois
class, as a
solution to what is today called a 'social problem'; secondly, 'this
same
social reform is the aim of the Bulgarian Macedonian-Adrianople
Constitutional
Party, except that for this party, the reform has a different, a purely
bourgeois
meaning. On the other hand, the Bulgarian Federal Party is also as
nationalistic as the first party. The difference lies in the fact that
the
first party wants the Bulgarians to be united with
... There is little to add to my
letter No. 65
of this year. In the north, the military preparations are still going
on for an
eventual uprising. As I have already informed you, different leaders
have
formed their own detachments but they are not as yet active, either
because of
the winter, or because they are expecting a signal. I was informed
yesterday
that, besides the detachment of Stoyu Hadjiev, who fled from justice,
one of
Sandanski's aides, who has been roaming freely in the region of
Kroushevo
(Demir Hissar) has turned up near Yakovo and Bogoroditsa (Petrich), and
also
Mircho, with a detachment of six teen. Other smaller groups keep
visiting those
parts to boost Sandanski's influence. In the south, and especially
on the
plain of Syar, efforts most energetic, varied and more consistent than
ever
before are being made to ensure the final predominance of the
Bulgarians. I
cannot but express my fears as to the final victory of the Bulgarians.
Many
circumstances are in their favour while very few - in ours. On top of
it all,
it would be added that the authorities tacitly support them, because in
their
stupid shortsightedness they imagine that by supporting Sandanski's
people, it
will weaken the Supremists who, according to the thoughtless
Turks, are the
only danger! Thus we are witnessing the pitiful sight of Bulgarian
leaders and
their aides and all sorts of other agents freely visiting the villages
and
farms on the plain with the approval of the Turks and are using all
possible
means of severing the ingenuous peasants from the Orthodox Church and
making
them join Sandanski's party which is friendly to the Turks! - in spite
of the
fact that these neophites are later sent to the Bulgarian agent here or
the
archpriests, these official organs of the Supremists, to help their
cause. In
this way, with promises or threats, they persuade the peasants to hand
in
petitions asking for Bulgarian schools and churches, etc. Thus, a few
days ago,
the chief official in the
As I informed you a
second
time by telegram, there is no freedom of conscience, the terror
goes on and
the daily petitions from the Bulgarian-speaking population for
separation from
the Patriarchate are the result of violence and fraud. The generous
promises
and monstrous lies for liberation in the near future, and, above all,
the
promise to distribute the farm lands of the beys, and the collection of
taxes
allegedly for this purpose, are well known to the Turks and all the
activity
for turning the population into Bulgarians is being done under
their
protection. At the same time, any of our people who dare, even by word,
to act
against the Bulgarians, are arrested and severely punished by the
authorities.
It is strange that the government is blind to the extent that it takes
no
notice of the voices of despair, the protests of the archbishops, nor
ours, nor
does it realize that, once the plain becomes Bulgarian, the Bulgarian
masses,
compact and united, will roll down like an avalanche towards the sea,
while the
Greek minorities are disappearing completely and the Turkish population
itself
is becoming an insignificant minority.
Indeed, the Bulgarian
lies are
inexhaustible and they are amazingly inventive as to new attractive
promises,
such as liberation in the near future, a speedy declaration of war, the
crossing of the boundaries by Bulgarian military forces, complete
exemption
from taxes, the giving back of schools and churches, the founding of
agrarian
banks, the building of railways and communication means, free schools,
etc.,
and finally the distribution of farm land. In this way, the poor
population,
under the constant influence of the prospect of happiness in the near
future,
is in a state of excitement and apart from the taxes which it is
obliged to
pay, it is ready to act against those who stand in the way of its
well-being!
And when the manipulators of this policy of fraud and lies get the wind
that
their influence is declining and that the truth is coming to light,
they immediately
resort to new tactics. Thus, recently, when the peasants began to cool
towards
them because none of the promises had been kept, they began to organize
rallies. Mass rallies were organized in Melnik, Nevrokop, Demir Hissar,
and
only the meeting in Djoumaya did not take place, owing to the
opposition of
our people. In view of the fact that the population in these centres is
Greek,
the peasants from the neighbouring villages were invited to attend the
rallies.
There were fiery speeches in Bulgarian and Turkish, expressing the
people's
indignation over the non-fulfilment of the promises of the Constitution
and the
fact that no railways, no schools, no agrarian banks, no hospitals, no
roads,
no post offices, no military service for the Christians in the
district, no
interest-free loans, no distribution of farm land, nor anything else
promised
had materialized. Moreover, identical resolutions prepared in advance
were
adopted and sent to the government and the National Assembly. On the
other
hand, the Bulgarian Clubs in Soloun, in a long circular letter
distributed in
thousands of copies throughout villages and farms, ask for information
on the
problem of the distribution of the farm land which is to be carried out
either
by a decision of the National Assembly or by a court, by proving that
the
present farm hands had once been the real owners of the lands which
were later
seized by the beys and turned into their own private farms. By this
means,
Sandanski's men revive their influence and, at the same time, instill
hatred
towards the Turks in the hearts of the peasants, while the Turks
patiently put
up with everything that is going on. Indeed, great excitement has
lately been
visible, and this is not only to the detriment of our interests, but we
are
being fatally pushed towards the agrarian problem, the consequences of
which will
be fatal for the Turks both politically and economically. This is
actually the
aim of the Bulgarians, who are working with great skill.
As far as particulars
go, it
should be noted that the struggle between the Supremists and
Sandanski's men is
still in progress and in many places skirmishes are taking place.
On February
1st, Hristo Haliani, the leader of the Supremists in Kroushevo, was
killed. In
the
For them (the Greeks)
the
situation has remained unchanged for the last month. All those who were
leaders
up to a short time ago and the andarts have either left, or are
devoting
themselves to peaceful activities. They are constantly under
supervision and
are often troubled without cause by the authorities. In general, our
people,
due to the natural character of the nation which is inclined towards a
peaceful
and quiet life, and is, at the same time, aware of the more general
reasons for
preserving absolute calm, are displaying impeccable and loyal
behaviour. The
Greek element is engaged in peaceful life and progress, but is
displaying a
large dose of cosmopolitism, which our organization, weakened for
obvious
reasons, is not in a position to fight. Indeed, our people realize the
critical
situation and are well aware of the avalanche coming from the north,
but are
not in a position to do anything on their own initiative, without being
pushed
or made to act. The armed struggle during the last four or five years
has not
been sufficient to cure them of the aftereffects of the long and fatal
oppression and to mould characters standing above factions and
factional
interests, and capable of carrying the struggle by peaceful means. They
accept
the unjust attitude and hatred of the Turks fatalistically and, in
justification,
they point to the same policy of official
In spite of the severe
economic crisis affecting the country, I have to admit with sorrow
that the
patriotism of our compatriots has not reached the point at which they
would sacrifice
part of their material interests for the national cause. That is why
those who
came from the north constitute such a danger, whether they come through
the
natural evolution of things, or, following a certain political
programme, to
work or to settle in the
rich Greek zone, and, since they are numerous, industrious, content
with
little, thrifty, they compete successfully with our people.
And, in spite of the
fact that
the economic conditions of our people are also deteriorating because of
the
economic war declared by the Turks, unfortunately since the
Constitution was
proclaimed, nothing has been done on the initiative of the local
authorities,
nor on our own initiative, to increase the resources of our people, or
to
extend the scope of their labour activities, or to find new horizons
for
enrichment by exploiting the numerous natural resources of the country.
This is the situation, and one can look to the
future only with apprehension as far as
the problems of our people are concerned in this part of the
country.
Йордан поп
Георгиев и Ст. Н. Шишков, Българите в Серското поле, II изд., Пловдив,
1918, (Yordan pop
Georgiev and S. N. Shishkov, The Bulgarians in the Valley of
Syar), II ed.,
In my letter No. 1351
drew
your attention to the increasing seriousness of the
agrarian question.
Since I consider that
this
question is more important than the Church question and since it will
have a
more profound influence on the Macedonian task and finally on our
struggle, I
have the honour again to appeal to the Royal Cabinet for co-operation.
The Bulgarians, true to
their
principle that the Macedonian struggle has to be waged with material
sacrifices
of
Before the Constitution,
the
agrarian question was one of the most important plans of the
Bulgarian cause,
but since July 11th this question has become the basic concern of
Bulgarian
propaganda. Indeed, if some other event, be it war or radical agreement
among
the European Powers, does not solve the Macedonian question, there is,
in my
opinion, no doubt that the solution of the agrarian question will
prepare the
final solution of the Macedonian question. Earlier on, the Bulgarians
promised
that the distribution of the farm land would start immediately after
the
unification of
Probably the Turkish
government, after being informed about the real reasons of the agrarian
question, will defer as long as possible the fulfillment of this unwise
political promise of the Young Turk Committee. But is it possible to
defer
things ad infinitum in the face of the constant threat of rebellion on
the part
of the farm hands? Would it not find itself in a dilemma?
From the Greek point of
view,
the results will be no less detrimental because the Bulgarian-speaking
farm
hands and the poor peasants, lured by prospects of a happy future, are
joining
the other side. And when the distribution of land, no matter under
what
circumstances becomes a fact, they will finally declare themselves to
be
Bulgarians and this will lead to all the consequences mentioned
above. It is
not possible that the Royal Ministry does not know, from word of mouth
or from
the written reports of all consuls in
I am aware of the many
difficulties in the way of such an attempt. But I feel obliged to
express my
opinion on the real situation and to repeat once more that the zone
under
dispute, i.e., the Macedonian question, will be a lost cause for us
unless we
do decide to change our ways of action without, however,
increasing the
budget. Otherwise, everything now being spent will be in vain.
In the history of
the peoples, there are crucial moments when all the forces of a nation
must be
mobilized, when all its national might must be directed towards a
single goal.
There are fateful moments of strenuous struggle, moments, in which fate
tests
the peoples and their viability, placing in their paths obstacles that
are
difficult to surmount. At such moments of struggle, of organization and
stress
the nation as a whole demonstrates its physical and spiritual forces,
at such
moments it shows and develops its highest qualities and civic virtues.
Such
moments of upsurge and stress are moments of idealism, of civic
courage, and of
self-sacrifice. These are moments in which individual and public
thought
matures rapidly, in which strong characters and personalities are
created and
forged.
Such
moments in the history of the peoples are transient like everything
else in
life. They remain alive, however, in the memories of succeeding
generations. In
them, these generations contemplate the beauty and nobility woven on
the loom
of their national history. Towards these moments veiled in the darkness
of the
past, posterity turns its eyes to admire and to draw wisdom and courage
from
them. These historical moments continue to live in the memory of the
nations,
and they live in the names of a handful of representatives, a
handful of
heroes of these moments, in the names of the personalities who
expressed most
clearly the nation's power, who headed the movement, who were its soul
and in
whom, as in a focus, were concentrated the nation's strivings and
wishes.
The
Bulgarian population in
And among
them the man who best expressed the people's strivings, whose personal
qualities, whose selfless loyalty to the cause, whose energy, sharp
mind and
organizational talent made him the soul of the movement - this man was
Gotse
Delchev. He it was whose
wishes and aspirations were more ardent than anybody else's, who
saw further
than anybody else, and who was ahead of everybody else. And is it
strange that
he was among the first to give his life at the beginning of the
decisive
struggle?
He died one
of the first, and, let us admit it, his death was timely. He did not
see the
ruin of the cause to which he had dedicated his life. He did not see
the crisis
of defeat, of the inevitable decline and degeneration of the movement.
How many
of his comrades who are still living, remembering his death, would not
say that
he was 'a fortunate man.'
Yes,
indeed, he was fortunate, because, while alive, he had the rare
happiness of
being at the head of the fighters for a great human cause. He was
fortunate,
because the coming generations venerated in him a whole epoch of
tenacious and
bloody struggle, an epoch of upsurge and idealism. In his person
posterity
venerates the memory of thousands of simple fighters for freedom, they
venerate
the most noble personal and civic virtues of a revolutionary period.
And the
more this period recedes into the past, the more clearly his image
stands out
in an aura of heroism and nobility.
After July 10th, so
festively
celebrated throughout the Empire, here comes July 20th. In two days'
time it
will be Ilinden. There will be no bonfires; there will be no parades
and no
receptions; no flags will wave, no music will be heard in the streets
and on
the squares. But a natural, internal fire will warm the hearts of the
Ottoman
Bulgarians when they remember the terrible bloody parade commanded from
the
unassailable Macedonian heights six years ago; in their thoughts they
will pass
under the flags waving all over the forests and plains, and bringing
death with
them, so that afterwards freedom might be resurrected, they will listen
to the
recent past and hear the elegiac harmony of the gun shot and the dying
cry:
freedom or death.
Ilinden! A single word,
a
single name which expresses a whole great epic, the glory of a nation -
fighter
and slave.
July 10 was the epilogue
of
Ilinden; Ilinden, that was the most solemn act of the great Macedonian
revolutionary drama. Without Ilinden there would have been no July 10.
The
latter date is common to all Ottomans, Ilinden is ours, it is
Bulgarian. This
name alone is sufficient to bear witness to our unequalled share
in the
struggle for freedom; Ilinden was the price which we paid to taste the
abundant
advantages of a free life.
How fortunate we are
that we
can celebrate one glorious date, before memories of the other have
faded away!
How proud we are to see
in the
dawn of freedom the rays which form a shining halo for so many heroes
who have
perished!
Is it possible to
contain
within the narrow columns of a small newspaper what is great and
boundless?
Dare we underestimate the significance of this glorious day in our
attempt to
describe it here when it is drawn with deep furrows in the hearts of
all
Ottoman Bulgarians, living witnesses of the great cause? Read the
history of
Ilinden throughout the vast plains of Macedonia: there it is written
with the
bones of the dead fighters; read it in the derelict huts in the
villages: there
it is carved with the suffering of the people; read it in the raised
scars from
chains on the wrists, necks, ankles of so many prisoners and emigrants,
who
were freed by July 10th: there you will find-traits of the greatness of
the
Bulgarian soul which in suffering becomes still more noble; listen to
the sad
weeping of orphans and widows; listen to the heartrending tales around
the fire
told by homeless old people; listen to the folk-songs telling of
incredible
heroes with unknown graves in forests, groves and valleys! Everywhere
Ilinden
has written its story. Look around and read with reverence what you
cannot fmd
here since it is unencompassable. Ilinden is before us! On your knees
in memory
of the heroes of Ilinden! On your knees!
Late last night, when
the
Congress of the Federalists were discussing Article 32 of the
Party programme
on the question of education, a delegate spoke against the Exarchate,
saying
that it had not fulfilled its duties properly and that it was an
impediment to
education in Macedonia. There was general excitement.
At this moment,
Sandanski, who
was chairing the Congress, stood up and in a shaking voice forcefully
declared:
'Don't touch the Exarchate! The situation in
This made a deep
impression on
those present. Afterwards, nobody mentioned the Exarchate in the
discussions.
1 A daily newspaper, which, during the summer
of 1909, sent a special
correspondent to Soloun in connection with the congresses of the
Bulgarian
parties in
'The comrades from
Soloun,
Strumitsa and Syar had gone too far in their adherence to Ottoman
Turkey and
had overt Ottoman centralist sentiments, obviously influenced by the '
'Not only I, but many
Macedonians from the left wing were against the standpoint of
Chernopeev and
his associates. The opinions of those who opposed this stand point,
completely
coincided with mine. It was also shared by Yane Sandanski, Dimo
Hadjidimov*,
Gyorche Petrov, Pere Toshev and many more. In the very beginning, after
the
coup, two trends took shape in the Macedonian left-wing and this was
obvious
from their press. The differences between the two trends were not only
on
matters of the Exarchate, but also on other political questions and
this was
clearly discernible from the writings in their newspapers and from
their
contents; for instance, on the one hand, the newspaper Narodna Volya
(Popular Will) and, on the other, the newspaper Konstitoutsionna
Zarya
(Constitutional Dawn). These differences stood out still more clearly
at the
first Congress of the left wing in 1909, when the foundations of the
federal
party were laid. At that Congress, when the question of the Exarchate
was put
on the agenda and Chernopeev and his other associates upheld their
stand on the
matter, Yane Sandanski sharply stated that no encroachments should
be made
upon this national institution and that, if one day, the Exarchate were
threatened, he was ready to take up arms again and go in the Pirin
Mountains to
fight in its defence.'
* Dimo Hadjidimov (1878
-
1924), an activist in the Macedonian-Adrianople revolutionary movement,
born in
the
On the third of August,
in the
coffee-shop '
On behalf of the local
Party
organization, he said, I greet you. I see in you the fighters who
successfully
fought against the old regime. This is the guarantee that in the future
too our
Party will fight energetically against every kind of reaction, no
matter where
it comes from.'
Fifteen organizations
were
represented at the Congress: there were also several sympathizers, who
had been
in contact with the central group in Soloun. Here are the names of the
38
delegates to the Congress:
H. Yankov, D. Vlahov1
(Soloun), H. Mednikarov and T. Klifov (G. Poroy), St. Hadjiev and I.
Bizhov (D.
Hissar), Yane Sandanski and Kazepov (Melnik), St. Pashkoulev and Al.
Bozhikov
(Nevrokop), D. Koshtanov and G. Zahariev (G. Djoumaya), G. Ognyanov
(Maleshevo), K. Samardjiev and H. Chernopeev (Strumitsa), Pando P.
Manoushev
(Petrich), M. P. Gyoshev and D. Miraschiev (Veles), D. Daskalov and D.
Lazarov
(Tikvesh), Iv. Ikilyulev and N. Pettov (Koukoush), Iv. Manolev
(Bitolya), Yord.
Shourkov and F. Bayraktarov (
Six commissions were
elected
for working out the following:
a) The standing orders
of the
Congress
b) Party programme
c) Party Rules
d) The declaration of
the
Constituent Congress
e) A resolution on the
school
question and on teachers who are soldiers
f) A resolution on the
agrarian and refugee questions. The secretary of the local organization
in
Soloun, which prior to the election of a permanent central leading
body, was
provisionally charged with the functions of a central party group,
delivered a
report on the state of the Party since January 16th, when Hristo
Chernopeev
and Hr. Katrandjiev as representatives of the revolutionary district of
Strumitsa, Yane Sandanski, as the representative of the revolutionary
district
of Syar and the board of the people's organization in Soloun, had
signed
documents stating that they would work for the establishing of a legal
organization in their respective districts, similar to the ones in
Soloun and Koukoush.
They had also worked out directives for the newspaper Narodna Volya,
which became the organ of the Bulgarian People's Federal Party. In his
report,
Hristo Yankov stated the reasons why the report was not exhaustive. He
declared
that the central group from Soloun was not in a position to present a
report on
the state of the party, since it had been ignored almost by everybody,
especially in places, where it thought that there existed disciplined
and well
organized revolutionary organizations. After hearing the report of the
secretary of the people's organization in Soloun, the Congress, in
order to
have a better idea of the state of the party in the country, decided to
invite
all the delegates to report on the state of the party in their
respective districts,
on the forces it had at its disposal and also about the
difficulties the Party
and its sympathizers were experiencing in their activity. The floor was
taken
by Mednikarov, Koshtanov, Tomov, Sandanski, Shourkov, Daskalov,
Manolev,
Zahariev and Bizhov. All that the above-mentioned comrades said can be
summarized as follows:
The population is under
pressure from members of the nationalistic Constitutional Clubs and is
being
terrorized by remnants of the former revolutionary organization: the
government
of the country is still in the hands of people belonging to the former
regime
and the authorities do not trust the population; moreover, our people
have no
material means to go and do agitation work among the population.
Because of
all this, the Party cannot boast of great achievements.
The editor of the Party
organ Narodna
Volya explained the principles followed by the newspaper. What he
said can
be summarized as follows: The task of the People's Federal Party is to
organize
all revolutionary forces in the country and to complete the revolution
which
has been started. The newspaper Narodna Volya was taking this
road. Due
to language and other problems, we cannot, for the time being, work
among other
nationalities: we are now organizing mainly the Bulgarian revolutionary
forces.
All parties here are based on a national separatist basis, the only
exception
is the People's Federal Party, whose aim is to organize all
elements
dissatisfied with the economy of the country. We have to win over the
ruined
small-holders. But the economically oppressed population is, at this
moment,
mainly occupied with the churches and not with its economic interests.
This
means that propaganda has got the upper hand. We have to organize this
population in the name of its own interests and in this way we
shall sever it
from the influence of propaganda. The attitude of the People's Federal
Party
towards the '
During the discussion on
the
party programme, the Congress, disgusted at the lies and intrigues of
the agent
of the Bulgarian Telegraph Agency, which by its reports and telegrams
aims at
disorganizing the Party and provoking controversies in its ranks,
expressed
its contempt for the agent, who did not miss a chance of slandering a
delegate
and praising others. All the delegates unanimously condemned the
correspondent
of the Bulgarian Telegraph Agency. In one of his dispatches, he had
written
that things were developing according to what Chernopeev wanted, i.e.
the
Bulgarian schools in Strumitsa were to be subsidized by the government
and that
Sandanski was the boss of the People's Federal Party. In connection
with this
the Congress declared that the People's Federal Party was democratic in
its
aims and membership, that it had no boss, or bosses; that there were
only equal
members in the Party. For his part, Yane Sandanski declared that, for
him as a
democrat, it was degrading to be the boss and not the comrade of the
members of
the Party.
During the discussions
on the
programme, the Rules, and the declaration, as well as on the
resolutions of the
Congress, there were no differences of principle. The basic
principles of all
the decisions of the Congress were the principles of democracy and
people's
rule. The well-being of the mass of the people - this was what all
delegates to
the Congress always had in mind.
Finally the Congress
elected,
according to the Rules of the party, by secret ballot, a bureau of
three, and
six counsellors. As members of the central bureau the following were
elected:
A. Matliev, D. Vlahov and H. Yankov (Soloun). For counsellors: A.
Buynov
(Razlog) D. Daskalov (Tikvesh), D. Koshtanov (G. Djoumaya), Yane
Sandanski
(Melnik), H. Chernopeev (Strumitsa) and Yordan Shourkov (Skopje).
The Congress ended on
August
10th late at night, with a speech by D. Koshtanov, who was presiding
and who
wished the party comrades success in their
future work.
When the Young Turks
declared
the Hürriyet (freedom), the Bulgarian population fighting for
liberation in
Macedonia and in the Odrin region rejoiced and became peaceful,
believing it had
been indeed granted all its rights, written into the Constitution
proclaimed by
the Ottoman Empire (Articles 8-26 and 108).
The Bulgarian population
believed that it would have equal rights; there would be no longer any
difference between it and the Turkish population as far as the
authorities of
the Empire were concerned; that the life, health, property and honour
of
everyone would be protected and respected, that homes would be
considered
inviolable; that there would be prompt and strict justice for all
without
discrimination; that there would be free communications, trade,
criticism, a
free press, freedom of education, freedom of conscience, freedom of
assembly
and associations; that the newly gained rights would not be taken away;
that
work would be organized and ensured, that the position of farmers would
be
relieved, and that every one in the Empire would be able to live and
develop
freely and peacefully.
The Bulgarian
population,
however, has received nothing from the new regime. On the contrary, it
has
realized that it has been fooled, and it is disgusted by Turkish
perfidy.
The Young Turk regime
took no
steps to improve the means of livelihood of the population in
1. First, the new
Turkish
regime merged the budgets of the three vilayets with that of the whole
state,
in spite of the autonomous rights granted to
2. Instead of leaving
the
settlement of church disputes to local legal authorities according to
the
country's laws of settling routine civilian disputes, the new Turkish
government persists in its most hazardous political course concerning
the
church issue, so as to engage in intrigue and fan internal strife among
the
Ottoman Christians.
3. The Young Turk regime
attempted to close the schools of the Bulgarians. It took a number of
steps,
seeking to replace them by state-run schools in spite of Article 15 of
the
Constitution, which recognizes the right to the existence of private
schools,
and in spite of our rights acquired under the old regime.
4.
It issued a law
against
idlers, and introduced flogging as a punitive measure in spite of
Article 26 of
the Constitution, which prohibits flogging and torture as punitive
measures on
the part of the authorities and their organs. This law was especially
directed
against former members of rebel detachments.
5. It passed a law
restricting
the press.
6. It curtailed the
freedom of
assembly and associations.
7. It set up Turkish
bands to
terrorize the Bulgarian population, and gradually to exterminate all
former
voivodes and rebels.
8. It deprived the
Christian villages
of the right to have their own field-watchmen, and appointed
field-watchmen
from among the most desperate Turkish bandits, instead of granting
Christian
villages the right to communal self-government, and the right to
organize their
own field-guards in order to protect their property.
9. It took care to
reinforce
the Turkish population by settling refugees, giving them the best land.
Thereby
the Young Turks clearly show that they have not become Ottomans,
because they
do nothing to improve the lot of the Christian farmers, citizens of the
10. The new regime
invented a
draconian law against the rebel detachments which did not exist.
Introducing
its evil measures aimed at suppressing and weakening the
Christians, it
provoked the latter, and then applied this law even before it had been
discussed and passed by Parliament.
11. Under this evil law
it set
up secret courts-martial which tried a number of Bulgarian suspects and
sentenced them to exile and death without any legal defence, sending
also their
parents, wives and children into exile. Whereas the murderers of Vassil
Adjalarski and of a number of other good Bulgarians, are not being
prosecuted,
or, in the event of their being caught, they are never punished,
because they
are members of the organized Turkish bands of the authorities
themselves.
12. Finally, the organs
of the
Young Turk government banned the word Hürriyet, 'freedom' in a
number of places
in
The Turks did not assess
the
situation soberly, and failed to use it for the common benefit of
everybody in
the country.
They were merely content
with
having fooled and paralyzed the revolutionary struggle and interference
from
without, so that they could prolong the days of their severe rule over
the
subordinate peoples and the lands which they have seized. So much the
worse for
them! They have proved yet again that they are in the throes of death.
We must
speed up this process, and throw off the burden of the dying corpse,
which is
today called the
It is incumbent upon us,
Bulgarians, being the majority in
The Central Macedonian
Committee calls upon all sincere patriots to resume their work, and
appeals to
all free and enlightened nations and states to take a just stand on the
situation,
and lend their moral and material support to gaining Macedonia's
autonomy - and
to restore the political, economic and educational freedom of all
people in
that land.
The lofty goal in the
name of
which Slav congresses have been held for several years now, namely to
attain a
closer unity culturally and economically among the various Slav
peoples, so
that they can easily preserve their particular position and original
way of
life in the general competition of nations through mutual cultural
cooperation,
so as to be able, in a spirit of unity, to take a more impressive part
in the
cultural development of mankind, and to introduce their original
outlook into
world culture under better circumstances, all this has inspired
us, Macedonian
Bulgarians, living in Sofia, to address the honourable Slav Congress
with a few
sincere words about the particular state of affairs in Macedonia, where
conditions run counter to the mutual understanding of the Slav nations.
It is known that half of
the
population in
The disastrous Treaty of
Berlin was a turning point in the attitude of the Serbs: by entrusting
the
government of the Turkish districts of Bosnia and Herzegovina inhabited
by
Serbo-Croats to the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, the Treaty frustrated
the hope
of the Serbs to see those territories, or the bulk of them,
incorporated into
their own state, and thus preserved for their own national culture.
From that
ill-fated moment on, no doubt at the suggestion of certain spheres
hostile to
Slav unity, the Serbs of the Kingdom were seized with the ambition to
expand
into the Slav people different from themselves, and to seek, by all
means, to divert
it from its age-old national aspirations, and to impose upon it a
culture
repugnant to it. They unleashed propaganda unprecedented in scale,
aimed at
implanting a Serbian spirit in the population of Macedonia, which has
been
Bulgarian from time immemorial and which was the first to raise the
banner of
the liberation of the Bulgarian people from the heavy Phanariot yoke;
which, in
the glorious times of our national Revival in the first half of the
last
century, produced a number of illustrious men such as the monk Joakim
of
Kichevo, the archimandrite Anatoli and bishop Parteni of Debur, the
metropolitan bishop Nathanail of the village of Kouchevitsa (Skopje
district),
Father Neofit Rilski from Bansko, the father of Bulgarian book printing
Hadji
Teodosi Sinaitski from Doiran, Kiril Peichinovich from the Tetovo
district, the
Miladinov brothers from Strouga, Grigor Purlichev and Kouzman Shapkarev
from
Ohrid, Yordan Konstantinov Djinot, Angeiko Palashev and Raiko Zhinzifov
from
Veles, Nako Stanishev from Koukoush, Emanuil Vaskidovich from Melnik
and others
- and which population has always, in all the vicissitudes in the
history of
the Bulgarian people, thought itself one with its brothers on this side
of the
Rila and the Rhodopes.
The first deplorable
effect of
this course of Serbian cultural and political propaganda was that
disastrous
fratricidal war which offered mankind a disgraceful spectacle of
Slav discord
and lack of understanding. Despite the historical lesson, however, this
policy
of encroachment upon the indisputable rights of one Slav people upon
another,
was not interrupted, on the contrary, it was carried on with even
greater
vehemence, and conscious of its impotence to achieve any tangible
results
without resorting to drastic means, began to employ most unsavoury
means in
order to ensure even the smallest degree of success for its unjust
cause. As
the Bulgarian population did not easily succumb to the 'cultural'
blandishments of this propaganda, the latter entered into collusion
with the
century-old enemy of Slav culture on the Balkan Peninsula with the
Oecumenical
Patriarchate; besides, in amost unpardonable way it used the corrupt
Turkish
administration, in order to demoralize the Bulgarian population,
and to
disunite it; at last, when none of this proved to be of any use in
breaking
down the population's resistance,
Serbian propaganda resorted to terror, and in order to carry on
its
infamous policy more easily, it entered into collusion with the very
authorities, seeking to sow discord among the sturdy Bulgarian
population, and
thus, to weaken it. As an actual result of that violent attack of
Serbian
propaganda on the Bulgarian population, today we see intrigues and
discord
among the Slav population in that land, which in no way forwards the
noble task
of the Slav Congress. Those intrigues, maintained thanks to the strong
support
of the propaganda of the Serbian kingdom, which nevertheless would not
have
found fertile ground had it not been for the use of most ignoble means,
constitute a lasting source of hostility between the two neighbouring
Slav
peoples, whose relations could easily be used by enemies of Slav unity,
or if
not, might lead to fatal conflicts instead of understanding and
friendship.
Unless the circles
conducting
this propaganda, harmful to Southern Slav solidarity, come to their
senses, and
if this violent and treacherous propaganda continues in a land where it
has no
business, then the lasting hostile attitude of the Bulgarian population
in
Macedonia toward everything Serbian, of which it can see around it only
a
shameful manifestation, this policy is sure to act further toward the
alienation of the two neighbouring peoples, which, in the long run,
will become
two openly hostile camps. Because the state of affairs in
Today, the Bulgarian
people
look with lively sympathy upon the attempts of the leading
representatives of
the Slav cause to place Slav cultural unity on a strong basis, and,
therefore,
they warmly greet the Slav Congress in its young capital. Yet, nobody
knows
whether, under the pressure of public opinion which is now silent, lest
it
should harm the great cause, the Bulgarian champions of Slav unity
will not
soon find it impossible to take part in other congresses where
fine words will
be spoken of fraternity and understanding, while, in spite of those
phrases, a
kindred Slav people participating in those congresses, will in the
meantime
treacherously stab in the back a population, which for centuries, has
firmly
guarded its national identity and would not give it up now, in spite of
the
unheard-of sufferings.
Inspired by a deep love
for
common Slav unity, we, Macedonian Bulgarians in the capital of
Bulgaria, take
the liberty of voicing to the Slav Congress our firm conviction that
all noble
efforts of the champions of cultural unity between the Slavs will be in
vain,
as long as that propaganda, harmful to the interests of the Southern
Slavs, is
maintained, which shall be a lasting source of hatred between the two
most
outstanding branches of southern Slavdom.
Macedonian brotherhoods:
In the meantime, the
volunteers in
On October
26, the officers enlisting volunteers in
Headquarters
decided to form six battalions only from the volunteers in
After the
officers were thus elected, Headquarters, together with the
battalion
commanders, undertook the formation of the
battalions themselves, as follows:
The
Debur Battalion
is to consist of citizens of Debur only,
by reason of their costumes.
The
The
Solom Battalion -
of the
Shtip, Syar, Drama, Salonica and Koukoush Brotherhoods, entirely on the
basis
of the territorial principle.
The
Bitolya Battalion - of the
Bitolya, Prilep and Tetovo Brotherhoods along the same system.
The Ohrid Battalion — 1st company of the Kroushovo
Brotherhood, 2nd company of the Kostour Brotherhood, 3rd company of the
Ohrid
and Resen Brotherhoods, and 4th company of the Ohrid and Kichevo
Brotherhoods
i.e. on the basis of the regional system.
Technical
Unit - with 12
heliographers from the telegraph company and 6 heliograph stations,
supplied by
the inspector of the engineering corps, and with volunteer high-school
and
university students, technicians, engineers, etc. is gradually to
organize the
following platoons: engineering (bridge and field), signals,
heliograph,
telephone, bicycle, mortar, mine-laying subversion and
chemical-warfare,
electrical-repairing, mechanical workshop and transport platoon.
Medical
Company - with
volunteer
medical orderlies, who will initially run the volunteers' infirmary in
The
formation of the six battalions began on September 26 and was almost
completed
by the 30th. On October 1, the Debur,
'To
The
1789 Revolution in France, and the one in 1848 in Germany and the other
countries, were bourgeois revolutions, because the liberation of the
countries
from absolutism, and from the privileges of big landowners and of
feudal lords,
in actual fact, provided freedom for the development of capital. Yet it
is
self-evident that such a revolution was most insistently demanded by
the interests
of the working class, and even workers of 1789 and 1848, of those who
were
'non-party,' unorganized as a class, were front-ranking fighters in the
French
and German revolutions.
The
Macedonian landowners (the so-called spahis) are Turks and
Moslems, and
the peasants are Slavs and Christians. Therefore, the class
contradiction is
sharpened by the religious and national ones.
In
this way the victories of the Serbs and Bulgarians mean that the
domination of
feudalism has been undermined in Macedonia, it means that a more or
less free
class of landowning farmers has been created, it means that the overall
social
development of the Balkan countries has been ensured, which had been
held back
by absolutism and by the relations of serfdom.
The
bourgeois newspapers, beginning with Novoe Vremya and ending
with Rech,
are writing about the national liberation in the Balkans, ignoring the
economic
liberation. But actually it is the latter that matters most.
The
national liberation and complete freedom of the peoples to
self-determination
would inevitably result in their complete liberation from
landowners and
absolutism. And conversely, if the oppression of landowners and ;the
Balkan
monarchies remain over the peoples, national oppression will also
'definitely
remain to one degree or another.
Were
the liberation of
One
may well ask what historical reason has caused the question to be
settled
through war and not through revolution. The main historical reason for
this
lies in the weakness, disunity, underdevelopment and ignorance of the
peasant
masses in all the Balkan countries, as well as in the small number of
workers
who were well aware of the state of affairs, and demanded a Balkan
federal
(allied) republic.
Hence
the evident fundamental difference between the attitude of the European
bourgeoisie and the European workers towards the Balkan issue. The
bourgeoisie,
even the liberal one, of the type of our own cadets, is shouting about
the
'national' liberation of the 'Slavs.' This clearly distorts the meaning
and the
historic significance of the events which are currently taking place in
the
Balkans, this hampers the cause of the true liberation of the Balkan
peoples.
This has to a lesser or greater extent preserved the privileges of
landowners,
the lack of political rights and national oppression.
And
conversely, the workers' democracy is the only one which is
defending the real
and complete liberation of the Balkan peoples. It is only the economic
and
political liberation of the peasants of all the Balkan nationalities
carried
through to its conclusion, that can destroy all possibilities for
national
oppression of any kind.
Your
Majesty,
After
centuries-long sufferings, we were happy to see the day when Your
Majesty
visited the chief city of
Convinced
that, in these fateful days. Your Majesty is as anxious as we are to
preserve
the vital interests of our Bulgarian nation, we dare express, together
with our
deep gratitude for everything so far done by Your Majesty, the great
sadness
which is growing in us at the horrible thought that the liberation
struggle
now underway could be checked by the partial political division of our
dear
Macedonian homeland.
As
Your Majesty knows, the revolution in Macedonia was first initiated
soon after
the unfortunate Berlin Treaty, because it was then that the
population
realized that the distant goal of one of the Powers, most responsible
for the
destruction of the San Stefano Treaty, was to prevent the unification
of the whole
Bulgarian people by separating from Bulgaria that part of Macedonia
which is
most substantial and most valuable for us. The Internal Revolutionary
Organization, fully aware of the fact that the more time passes, the
harder it
would be to get back what was lost through the Berlin Treaty, fought
constantly
with the modest help of the enslaved people and gave the Turkish Empire
no
peace until it was finally shattered. In spite of the great
difficulties which
the Internal Organization had to face here and outside, it
unflinchingly
pursued one and the same sacred goal - to save Bulgarian Macedonia for
the
Bulgarian people - undivided and integral. In view of the obvious
predatory
intentions of the neighbouring states and the difficulties involved in
the direct
liberation of all
For
this reason, stating the above, the Internal Organization, true to its
dear
behest to work for the freedom of the whole of Macedonia, dares to
extend to
you, on behalf of the harassed people, a request, asking Your Majesty
to intervene,
with all possible means to the end, so that any partition may be
avoided. Your
Majesty may rest assured that in this matter he can rely on the help of
the
Macedonian Bulgarian, to the very last drop of his blood.
From
the Central Committee of the IMARO (seal)
The
general mobilization of the Bulgarian army against the Turks was
carried out on
September 30th, 1912. All Bulgarians from
The
Volunteer Corps, consisting of 14,670 men, had 12 battalions: with
People from
Debur,
No
sooner had they been organized than the volunteers engaged in
operations.
According
to their place of birth, the volunteers are classified as follows: from
the
district of Bitolya - 457, from the district of Veles - 449, from the
district
of Voden - 79, from the district of Gevgeli - 246, from the district of
Gorna
Djoumaya - 162, from the district of Gostivar - 104, from the district
of Debur
- 1,Oil, from the district of Demir Hissar - 234, from the district of
Doiran -
73, from the district of Drama - 124, from the district of
Enidje-Vardar - 104,
from the district of Zuhna - 4, from the district of Kaylare - 36, from
the
district of Kichevo - 350, from the district of Kochani -203, from the
district
of Kostour - 409, from the district of Korcha - 6, from the district of
Kratovo
- 330, from the district of Egri-Palanka - 431, from the district of
Kroushevo
- 250, from the district of Koukoush - 512, from the district of
Koumanovo -
202, from the district of Lerin - 158, from the district of Maleshevo -
77,
from the district of Melnik - 240, from the district of Nevrokop - 715,
from
the district of Negotin - 12, from the district of Ohrid -542, from the
district of Petrich - 129, from the district of Pehchevo - 16, from the
district of Prilep - 501, from the district of Razlog - 359, from the
district
of Radovish - 89, from the district of Resen - 47, from the district of
Skopje
-207, from the district of Soloun - 194, from the district of Strumitsa
- 143,
from the district of Strouga - 40, from the district of Syar - 197,
from the
district of Tetovo - 171, from the district of Tikvesh 108 and
from the
district of Shtip - 440.
The
Macedonian and Odrin volunteer forces consisted of three brigades and
were
organized as a division with its own services. General Genov was
appointed
commander of the volunteers, Colonel St. Nikolov from Prilep was
appointed as
commander of the first brigade. Colonel Pchelarov - of the second, and
Colonel
Protogerov - of the third.
In
February the Volunteer Corps was joined by three new battalions - the
Koukoush,
Voden and Shtip battalions.
On
May 2nd the Volunteer Corps left the coast of the
On
June 30th the fifteen battalions of the Bulgarian volunteers from
During
the retreat the Macedonian Volunteers were very often in the
rearguard. Until
the cessation of hostilities, they fought against the Serbs with
incredible
fury. On the eve of the signing of the armistice, when they already
knew that
the war was lost, they counter attacked against the Serbs without any
political
hope, just for the glory of dying for
When
the Treaty of Bucharest was signed, it was the Macedonian Volunteer
Corps that
had to hand over to the Serbians the piece of Macedonian land which
During
the two Balkan wars the casualties of the Macedonian Volunteer Corps
amounted
to 3,631, including 177 dead, 318 killed, 2,261 wounded and 377
missing, i.e.
25 per cent of its strength.
Most
honourable Mr. Prime Minister!
As
you are aware, the Bitolya district took the most active part in the
whole of
Indisputably,
the Bitolya district, populated
by a compact Bulgarian mass, took a most active part in the long
revolutionary
struggle: no other Macedonian region has as many Bulgarians as the
Bitolya
region, especially if we add the Kostour district to it,
which the Turks cunningly
severed from its natural centre - Bitolya - placing it in the Korcha
sandjak. A strong revolutionary
organization was formed here which held at bay the Turkish authorities
and the
other enemies of our political unification. The Ilinden Uprising of 1903 was organized and carried out
mainly by the Bulgarian population from the Bitolya vilayet. It was
only here
that the Bulgarian villages from
Reform
Programme to its logical
conclusion, that is, the creation of an autonomous
To our
great
regret, however, from this moment on, we were faced with grave trials
and
painful bewilderment. At the time, when the brave Bulgarian army was
defeating
the main Turkish forces on the eastern front of the war, securing the
rear of
the allied troops, the latter, easily and with insignificant losses,
conquered
the whole of western
The
Serbian administrative authorities
systematically make difficulties for Bulgarian merchants who want to
travel
from one place to another, refusing them passes under various pretexts,
whereas
whenever they issue passes, they attach Serbian suffixes to Bulgarian
names. In
addition, they hinder the opening of Bulgarian schools in towns and
villages,
they drive away teachers in a most brutal manner, declaring that they
will not
allow the existence of any Bulgarian schools in a Serbian land. In
Ohrid they
gave Serbian names to the streets; in Prilep, a town-crier announced
that,
apart from the Turks, everybody else should call himself Serbian. A
newspaper
began to be published in Bitolya, the articles of which allegedly show
that
there are no Bulgarians in that town. All this shows that the Serbs are
systematically trying to impart a Serbian character to the areas which
they
have occupied. In their attitude to the allegedly free Bulgarian
population,
the Greek military and civilian authorities are no better than the
Serbs. And
if the Greek military and administrative authorities in the Kostour
and
Lerin
districts are behaving a little more leniently, it is because they
themselves
feel weaker. All this, taken together, greatly disturbs us.
The
present war, which was undertaken,
according to the Royal Manifesto of His Majesty, the Tsar of the
Bulgarians,
with the aim of liberating the enslaved Bulgarians, has so far brought
a new
slavery to the compact Bulgarian centres like ours. There are obvious
examples
which indubitably show that the Serbs and the Greeks are planning to
remain the
rulers of our purely Bulgarian districts forever. Serbian and Greek
higher and
lower officials and administrative bodies openly declare that they will
not
withdraw from the Bulgarian lands which they have occupied. Whoever
dares
express the hope that our districts will be united with
The aim of
the
church struggle, in which you yourself took part as a young man, was,
as you
know, to achieve the cultural unification of the Bulgarian people.
The
champions of the National Revival, consciously or instinctively, also
paved the
way for the resurrection of the old Bulgarian kingdom within its ethnic
boundaries. And they were not deceived. Only five years after the
establishment
of the Bulgarian National Church, the Exarchate, Н. М. the Tsar Liberator Alexander II
and our
brothers, the Russian people, moved by the suffering of the
Bulgarians who
were not then strong enough to destroy domination by themselves,
declared the
memorable War of Liberation ended with the San Stefano Peace Treaty.
As you
know, under this treaty, almost all
Bulgarian lands formed one political unit. But to our deep regret,
there were
European powers, which either out of selfish interest or the inability
to
foresee the future, frustrated San Ste-fano
San
Stefano
The
unification of
Thus, Mr.
Prime Minister, all the peoples
surrounding us opposed our cultural and political unification. As
a result of
this policy, the suffering of that part of the Bulgarian people, which
was not
yet liberated, became unbearable. The Macedonian Bulgarians, not able
to react
against the violence within the bounds of the law, resorted to
underground
activity, and laid the foundations of the revolutionary organization.
Along
with its legitimate defence the latter aimed at achieving the direct or
indirect political unification of all Bulgarians by means of the
autonomous
stage. Because, as you know, Mr. Prime Minister, the principle of
autonomy was
a way of saving the integrity of
But due to
the circumstances, the
unification of the Bulgarian people into one state will not pass
through the
autonomous stage. After the meeting in Reval, clearly aware of the fact
that,
sooner or later, an autonomous regime would be granted to
Be that as
it may, the jeopardized future
of the Balkan states and the difficult plight of their compatriots
in
All these
regions, which are being
oppressed by our allies today, have made and continue to make costly
sacrifices
for the unification of the Bulgarian people.
The
present alarming situation in our
regions occupied by the Greeks and Serbs has made us, Mr. Prime
Minister, turn
to you and beg you at these fateful times of responsibility, to
continue
supporting the unification of all Bulgarian outlying parts with the
Bulgarian
state by all the means at your disposal.
If this
should
fail, if purely Bulgarian lands should be left under Serbian and Greek
domination, the population in them, forced to turn Greek of Serbian,
with its
national feelings hurt, will be compelled to resume its hard and
unequal struggle
for liberation. We have no doubt that the suffering of a part of the
Bulgarian
people will find a response, as it has hitherto, in new enlarged
Bulgaria, and
peace and tranquillity will not reign again in the kingdom, and
consequently
the heavy losses the entire Bulgarian people have suffered,
especially in the
present War of Liberation, will not have fully achieved their aim.
Confident
that you are well aware of the great responsibility, we hope that you
will not,
at any price, sacrifice parts of the Bulgarian national body. In turn,
we
assure, you, dear Mr. Prime Minister, that we are ready to add all
possible
sacrifices to those already made by Macedonia in the course of many
years, in
order to achieve these all-Bulgarian aspirations.
Esteemed
Mr. Prime Minister,
We, the
organized Bulgarians from the
Skopje Revolutionary District, overwhelmed by that blessed feeling
which the
slave of five centuries experiences at the dawn of his freedom, greet
through
you our northern brethren for their unforgettable exploit - with their might they have
resurrected the forgotten and abused justice in the Balkan Peninsula.
As sons of
the same motherland, we are
anxiously following the fateful events, and expect to see the cherished
dream
of an all-Bulgarian homeland and state come true. We do not want to be
severed
from that state, because the
Ethnographically,
the
Despite
the fact
that
The
In stating
this, Mr. Prime Minister, we
wish to remind the Bulgarian government - a reminder that is, probably,
unnecessary to educated
statesmen like yourself - that our region is an integral
part of the rest of Bulgarian
Macedonia and that, consequently, in the course of the present war,
pursuing
the liberation of the Bulgarian lands under Turkish domination, our
region
should not be forgotten either, and should not be left under a new
foreign
domination. It is to our deep regret, however, that very sad rumours
have
reached us, and they are constantly tormenting us. It is said that our
region
has been sacrificed, or that it will be sacrificed to the Serbs for
their
participation in the present war. The Serbs' conduct comes to support
these
rumours, and our fears are growing stronger. The Serbian authorities
are
settling down here as if for ever, and seem to be making a second
Serbian
capital out of
We dare
inform you, Mr. Prime Minister,
that the Bulgarians in the
The
emergency of the current historical
situation in our region, the thought of our future national existence
which has
been tormenting us for four months, has made us bring to your
attention,
through our representatives -mayors and counsellors, the
following request:
Far back
in history, when the Bulgarian
people formed a separate state and settled in the lands determined by
God's
will, our native land - the Lerin district, populated
by pure Bulgarians in origin and
language, was considered to be a Bulgarian region. As neighbours to our
district we have the glorious Ohrid and Prespa - holy places of Old Bulgaria,
and in the
days when the Bulgarian scepter stretched to this side of the
At the
time of the
church struggles and the upsurge of the Bulgarian national spirit after the
five
century-long double bondage, Lerin, just as the other Bulgarian
regions,
responded to the call of the movement for an independent national
church and
school. Lerin has given great Bulgarian patriots and generous donors as
the
long-lived Dr Mishaykov
from the village of Putelé, priests of the
Bulgarian church, such as the highly erudite
Metropolitan Panaret, born in the same village; it has also given
self-educated
scholars, followers of Paissi 's school, such as Gerassim, the
monk of
Athos from the village of Tursie, who left his cell in the Athos
monastery in 1894 and went to his
native village,
founded a Bulgarian school, and with his numerous students lighted the
torch of
the Bulgarian national consciousness in three neighbouring districts:
Lerin, Kostour
and
Prespa.
Lerin, the
central town of the district,
has been in the front ranks of the church struggles. Having passed as
early as 1875 under the
authority of the Holy
Exarchate, later, under unfavourable circumstances it suffered a
setback, and
has recently made new efforts and sacrifices to bring its national
character to
the fore. In the Lerin district there are villages, such as Ekshi-Su, Putelé and Zeleniché, which are a credit
to the
Bulgarian national spirit in
The
population in our district most
clearly expressed its national spirit and Bulgarian consciousness in
the
memorable turbulent revolutionary years, when the name 'Bulgarian' had
to be
defended at the risk of one's life, and to be inscribed in
martyr's blood in
the annals of Macedonia. Without sullying the banner of the Macedonian
Revolutionary Organization in the struggle against the five centuries
of
tyranny with the wild chauvinism inherent in the Greek and Serbian
organizations, the Bulgarian population of the Lerin district,
confident of its
power and the justice of its cause, openly waged an unequal battle
against the
Turks and Greeks, who were united in their effort to erase the
Bulgarian name
from the bloody forehead of Bulgarian Macedonia. And when in the
terrible year
of 1903 all Bulgarians in
that wretched
land had to be wiped out with fire and sword, the Bulgarians in the
Lerin
district, who produced a Marko, mourning over
their precious victims,
their houses burnt to ashes and their fields desolate, fully showed
their
national spirit to spite their two-headed enemy. Instead of engendering
passivity and wiping out the Bulgarian national traits from our region,
the
ill-fated revolution resulted in a new upsurge of the Bulgarian
national
spirit, and in a new triumph of the Bulgarian spirit in the Lerin
district. And
that insignificant Bulgarian minority with a non-Bulgarian
consciousness
hurried among the ashes of the unsuccessful revolution to take shelter
under
the protection of their own
And at the
present critical moment, just
as in the past, when we are faced with new temptations menacing our
people and
language, when we are again being lured to put on foreign masks, we
still feel
an inseparable part of the Bulgarian body, we all, as if by
inspiration,
feel Bulgarian more than ever -children of the
Bulgarian people.
The
enclosed table shows that the
overwhelming majority of the population of our regions has been
and continues
to be Bulgarian to the present moment. Out of a population of 60,027 we, the Bulgarian
members of
the Exarchate, number 32,140 people. The
members of the Patriarchate numbering 12,075 people, are of
various
nationalities: 6,897
Bulgarians,
2,130 Wallachians, 3,020 Albanians, who, sooner or
later, will acquire their natural character.
And this
flourishing Bulgarian region,
which has waged a heroic struggle for its national consciousness, which
has
produced Dr
Mishaykov,
Metropolitan Panaret, the Voyvoda Marko and others of the galaxy of
fighters,
today, when this region thought it was achieving its age-old sacred
dream - unification
with its free
brother on the other side of the Rila - it sees itself in the hands of
a government which, although
allied to Bulgaria, is actually infected with hatred and venom for
everything
Bulgarian.
Although
we are deeply convinced that this
government is temporary, that the fraternal and great Bulgaria of today
has
embarked on the current War of Liberation in the name of the
nation-wide
Bulgarian ideal (San Stefano Bulgaria), and that for nothing in the
world would
it sacrifice flourishing and historical regions of the Bulgarian lands,
such as
those of Lerin, Kaylar, Kostour, Prespa, the very
thought of it being
suggested in the forthcoming talks on the partitioning of the Turkish
inheritance that our district remain under another rule, a thought
which is
immensely tormenting our hearts, we considered it our patriotic
duty to ask
you, Mr. Prime Minister, the government of tsarist Bulgaria, not to
allow even
a hint of leaving our native region under Greek rule, for the sake of
the
galaxy of the heroes who, having laid down their lives for the
all-Bulgarian
ideal, for the sake of their orphans, widows, old people bent with age,
who,
like the righteous Simeon, are waiting to see one Bulgarian soldier
before they
die in peace, in the name of the all-Bulgarian ideal, in the name of
which the
current War of Liberation is being waged, not to allow new suffering
for us,
the Bulgarians of the Lerin district, in which case we would have no
choice but
to leave our native homes and go to great Bulgaria, or to devote
ourselves once
more to bloody struggles against the enforced rule, in order to
convince the
whole world and fraternal Bulgaria that we deserve a better fate.
Deeply
confident
that our just fraternal voice will be heard, and that soon we, too, the
residents of the Lerin district, will enjoy the happiness of joining
the
jubilation of our newly liberated brothers beyond the
During the
last century, the
The
Macedonian population found itself
faced with a hard ordeal: it had either to efface its character and be
on the
safe side, or take up a strenuous struggle against the three united
enemies and
boldly bear the cruel blows of
fate. Proud of its past, illumined by the
bright,
self-sacrificing personalities which it had born, the Macedonian
population
without hesitation took up the struggle and raised high its national
flag so
that the whole world could see and become convinced that it was, and
would
remain, Bulgarian in language, in consciousness, in feelings and in
aspirations. And this struggle showed itself:
1) Against the organs
of the Greek
Patriarchate and those of the Greek Kingdom, in order to finish the
process of
the spiritual liberation and national independence, begun as far back
as the
first half of the past century, precisely in Western Macedonia.
2) Against Serbian
propaganda, which, in
spite of the support rendered it by the Turkish government so as to
crush the
Bulgarian might, could not achieve any results;
3) Against the State
in order to improve the
political situation of the country. The revolutionary
organization, which
shook the foundations of the Turkish Empire in Europe and called forth
European
intervention, reforms and finally the Balkan War of liberation, was
Bulgarian: Bulgarians
shed their blood for the liberation of Macedonia, because only they
cared for
it as for a native land, while Serbia and Greece, foreigners to it,
supported
the Turkish domination and sent detachments, which united with the
Turkish
forces to persecute the fighters for freedom.
Thus, the
clearly expressed national
consciousness of the overwhelming majority of the Christian population
of
l) by the
general opinion of foreigners
travelling round
2) by the Turks, who
live there, and who in
Macedonia recognize only Bulgarians and Greeks (the few of the latter
who lived
there) and by the Turkish State, through the 1870 Sultan's Firman on the
establishment of a Bulgarian Exarchate, by the Law on the Contested
Churches
voted by Parliament in 1910, and a number of
other state acts;
3) by the Greeks who
live there and who
acknowledged only Vulgari, and by Greek propaganda, which did
not
acknowledge the Serbians in Macedonia, but did acknowledge the
Bulgarians,
though under the name of 'vulgarophoni';
4) by the fact that
in everyday life the
Bulgarian language has gained the upper hand among all foreign national
minorities, including the Turks;
5) by the
international Conference in
Constantinople in 1876,
which,
having established that Macedonia was populated mainly by Bulgarians,
included
it in the proposed Bulgarian region;
6) by Russia, which,
creating the
Principality of Bulgaria under the Treaty of San Stefano of February 19, 1878, included in it the
whole of
Macedonia, as a Bulgarian land.
Given
these obvious proofs of
This is
the reason why the Macedonian
population welcomed with rapture the alliance of the Balkan states and
the
common war against the Turkish domination in the Balkans. Confidently
seeing
this war, the realization of their most cherished hopes for liberation
from
Ottoman bondage and for national unification, it rushed
enthusiastically into
the last bloody fight with the ancient enemy. Macedonia sent thousands
of
battle-tried men to join the allied army: part of them formed the
Volunteer
Corps, which performed miraculous exploits in the Thracian plains and
on the
coast of the Sea of Marmara, another part formed numerous detachments,
and
courageously fought the enemy, shoulder to shoulder with the Greek,
Serbian and
Bulgarian armies on the Macedonian heights. The entire Bulgarian
population in
In that
war,
The
Bulgarian population throughout
The war
ended with a brilliant victory,
but alas, the joy of the Macedonian population was short-lived.
The
military and civil authorities in
those parts of
This
deplorable state of affairs, so
clearly revealed and supported by facts in the foreign press and by
foreigners - unbiased observers
- corroborates the
same old stark
truth: the Greeks and Serbians themselves prove that
The
behaviour of
The Balkan
peoples are badly in need of a
lasting peace after so many cruel battles, uprisings and wars during
the past
century. European diplomacy also wants peace in the Balkans, because
the
troubles are to the detriment of the cultural and economic interests of
the
Great Powers, and the spark of Balkan unrest is threatening to kindle a
conflagration throughout
The
Bulgarian Macedonian population, which
has proved by its valiant struggle for the preservation of its national
identity and the realization of its political ideal, that it is not an
inert
mass, solemnly declares through its associated representatives from the
whole
of
1) That it does not
recognize any contested
areas within Macedonia's boundaries, for it has, a long time ago,
defined and
sealed its national physiognomy with the blood of its sons;
2) That it considers
as its 'heart' those
parts of Macedonia, which by a bitter irony of fate were conquered by
the
foreign allied troops;
3) That, in its
well-defined and
stable national identity, it indignantly rejects the idea that part of
it
should be treated as a pawn in political machinations aimed at
gratifying
foreign claims that are absolutely unjustified.
In view of
this, the Macedonian population
firmly believes and hopes:
1) That Bulgaria,
which summoned Serbia and
Greece to an allied war against the Turks and which, with its help,
enabled
their armies to inscribe victories in their modern history, that
Bulgaria,
which bore the brunt of the war, which amazed the world with its army's
heroism
and which suffered the heaviest loss of human life, will not allow
any
amputation whatever to be performed on its national organism both
in its own
interests and in those of the coveted future peace among the Balkan
states, and
2) That the other
interested factors in the
Balkans will not cooperate in raising artificial political boundaries
between
the Balkan states -
boundaries,
which could become the cause of future unrest and conflicts.
I have the
honour to report that the
commander of the military post in Lovcha informed me that in Lovcha the
church
services are being conducted in Bulgarian, since there is no priest who
knows
Greek, and the Greek church books, and he (the commander) issued an
order
forbidding church offices to be conducted in Bulgarian.
I
recommended to the commander of the
military post that he allow religious services for the inhabitants to
continue
as hitherto, until a new order is issued.
In view of
all this, I beg you to assist
in the settlement of this question.
I am well
and wish you the same. On the
day I left Singel, I started very early and I could not bid you
good-bye, but
since I am confident of your kindness, I am sure that you will not take
this
amiss. It seems that the priest in Lyahovo is making fun of religion
without
having respect for godly and saintly things. Since Your Grace gave
orders for
services to be held in Greek, he has gone on doing so in Bulgarian,
pretending
that he is ill, while, in actual fact, he is healthy.
What I
have written to you, I have written
out of friendship, since I had the honour of making your acquaintance.
This
priest must be replaced because he is a pure Bulgarian and he should
feel your
firm hand.
'
A new
slavery began, this time under the
Serbs and Greeks, more dreadful than the Turkish domination, but at the
same
time the Macedonian Bulgarians began a new, much more determined
resistance.
The time
came for drafting conscripts from
The first
draft of Macedonian young men
was made in March 1914
by the
respective regimental districts, from whence the conscripts were sent
to
various towns within the old Serbian borders.
The Shtip
regimental district sent its
conscripts to the town of
We
departed from Shtip for Veles on March 23, 1914. On the next day we
arrived by
train at Kraguevac. From the station, we were billeted in taverns,
because the
barracks had not yet been prepared, probably they were still being
repaired.
There we spent two days. During that time, our people showed whatever
talent
they had - they played,
sang, danced, etc. -
things
conscripts usually do in order to kill time.
Two days
later, we were taken to the
barracks. There were four barracks in Kraguevac in those days, three of
them
big, new, modern buildings, and an old one, with long eaves, which
dated back
to the times of the Turks. Two of the new barracks were on the left
bank of the
Lepenitsa river, and the old barracks and the new engineering barracks
were on
the right bank. On the day after our arrival, we were issued new
uniforms, and
were divided into units. All the conscripts in Kraguevac, some 1,200 men, formed a regiment called
the
23rd Bregalnitsa Pouk (Regiment). The majority of the young men
assigned to it
were mainly from Shtip and its district, St. Nikole-Ovchepolia, Veles
and its
district, and a small number were from Doiran, Gevgeli, etc. The four
battalions,
as the Serbs called them, that were formed within the same regiment,
were
stationed in each of the four barracks. The commanders of the army, and
respectively of our regiment, battalion, company and platoon, were as
follows:
We were
immediately given the soldiers'
oath of allegiance, on mimeographed sheets, and we were ordered to
learn it by
heart by the day on which we were to take the oath.
On the
second day that we were in uniform,
we were taken to an (improvised) theatre performance - a plot from their heroic times,
and we marched through the main street of the town. The citizens were
noticeably surprised by the fine ranks we made, by the regular
beat, as we
sang Bulgarian marching songs, such as 'The Quiet White Danube', 'He Is
Alive,
He Is Still Alive', etc. It was a sensation for them to see conscripts
marching
in step from the very first day.
During the
lectures, we studied the oath
of allegiance, since every soldier was supposed to know it. When
examined,
however, no one said he knew it, for they had no desire to learn it,
let alone
say it. This riled them, but we claimed that we did not understand
Serbian.
April 10 ofthat same year (1914) was announced as
oath-taking day for the
first conscripts from 'South Serbia' (as the Serbs had begun to call
That same
day,
April 10,
1914, Sunday,
which was clear and sunny, after church, the conscripts stood in a
square on
the parade ground for the 1st and 2nd battalion
(on the left bank of the Lepenitsa river) and in the middle there was a
lectern, around which stood the priests and the officers, all in full
dress (in
those days all officers from majors up wore epaullettes), top
administration
officials, and foreign representatives from Belgrade, invited for the
occasion,
and all the citizens.
The order
was given to stand to attention!
The band played the national anthem 'God's Justice...' and afterwards the hymn 'How
Glorious...' According
to the established regulations in the Serbian Army, the soldiers had to
raise
their right hands, with three fingers extended to make the sign of the
cross,
and to pronounce aloud the soldiers' oath of allegiance, word for word
after
the archimandrite (the bishop's representative): 'I, (followed by the
name and
surname) swear to the Almighty God that I shall truly serve King
Peter the
First...'
THE
DECISIVE MOMENT HAD ARRIVED! IN AN
INSTANT THE AIR WAS RENT BY A DEAFENING HURRAH! WE WILL NOT HAVE IT! WE
ARE NOT
SERBS! etc., etc. Despite the command 'Attention!', the soldiers' ranks
were
broken and confusion set in. There was indescribable chaos. All those
present
were taken aback and surprised. Enraged, the officers, their sabres
drawn,
swung about and hit at us, but to no avail - the confusion increased more
and more. The townsfolk: men,
women and children, panicked, looked furtively about and ran, stumbling
over
one another, falling, rising, thronging and screaming with horror, 'Yao
kuku mené',
etc., shouts
they make to express
horror, fear and despair.
It was a
sight of a veritable mutiny, yet
one rarely seen, for it was happening in public, before officials,
before
foreign representatives, and before all the citizens, in a ceremonial
atmosphere, and in broad daylight.
In a short
while, the townsfolk ran home,
bruised and battered, by one another, and by the horror which had
seized them:
'The eyes of fear are big'. Left on the 'battleground' were only the
mutinous
conscripts, an armed Serbian platoon (it should be noted that we,
conscripts,
were completely unarmed), the officers and officials.
The
conscripts, pursued by the armed
Serbian platoon and the officers with their sabres drawn, were
scattered on the
parade ground in disorder - they attacked us and beat us
up, while we, with bare hands,
shielding ourselves from the blows, were expanding th circle.
The chaos
would have continued but for an
order of the regiment commander for the officers to gather around
the lectern,
and for the armed Serbian platoon to withdraw. After the latter's
withdrawal,
evidently for fresh instructions, the commotion subsided - everyone stood right where he
was.
The
officers returned to us, but desisted
from lashing out again, despite their anger, for fear of exacerbating
the
situation. They began to gather the soldiers, and make them form ranks.
The
only exception was the commander of the 2nd Battalion, Major Bozhidar
Zagorcic, a huge man, who was
hitting every soldier in his battalion, asking each one 'Do you
accept?' and
following each answer in the negative 'I do not!' with-a stunning blow
that
could even kill a man. He received an answer in the negative from 18 courageous young men, who were
immediately taken aside, and marched to the garrison prison.
Our aim
had been accomplished. What we
wanted to show the Serbs and the foreign representatives - that we are not Serbs, as they
presented us to the outside world, and that we did not want to pledge
allegiance to the Serbian state, this we had demonstrated in this case,
before
their very eyes.
They made
us fall into ranks again, and
they stood in front of us. Once again they tried to give the 'ceremony'
an
official appearance. The band played the anthem and 'How Glorious' once
again.
The archimandrite on the lectern said the oath, all by himself, for we
all
remained silent. Then he made a speech, in which he expressed regret at
our
having succumbed to 'Bulgarian propaganda' and said that we had
been misled,
that we were true Serbs, and some other well-known 'arguments' of
theirs.
After the
end of the ceremony, we were
marched back into the barracks. A real reign of terror began here. The
officers
from the whole battalion rushed into the barracks to beat us up with
whips, and
fists, and to shout in order to discover who the initiators of the
mutiny had
been. This is all they did till nightfall: they beat us up,
threatened us, and
interrogated the soldiers one by one. They became furious that all
soldiers
gave one and the same reply: 'I did not shout, and my comrades around
me were
silent, we did not know what was happening!' Some of the officers were
further
enraged by the same answers, and said 'Sons of bitches, there was a
hell of a
noise, and now you say you were quiet. Who made the noise then? Was it
us?'
The great
efforts of the Serbian officers
did not lead them to the desired result - no one betrayed any one. This
event was the greatest test
for the Macedonian young men, which proved their maturity and endurance
in
defending their national honour.
This was
followed by days of strict
confinement and Ш treatment,
abuse, denigration, irony, etc., which only went to show that they were
as
alien to us as we felt them to be. This made us even prouder and
bolder, and
our self-confidence became even higher.
The
soldiers were
drilled about a kilometer outside the barracks, in a place called
Stanovlyansko
Pole. Every day, they would take the 18 courageous young men who had
enfuriated the 2nd
Battalion
Commander Bozhidar
Zagorcic out of prison and bring them there to identify the
initiators of the
mutiny. We were being drilled in groups often. We were ordered to stand
to
attention. The Captain who led the prisoners, the so-called garrisoner,
would
point a finger at each of the soldiers standing at attention, and would
ask:
'Was he the one?' The reply of the prisoners was, 'No it was not him!'
In this
manner, they went from person to person, but the result was always 'No,
it was
not him!' This harassment was repeated every day until the war with the
Austro-Hungarian; Empire was declared in July 1914 (The First World War). These
unfortunates (18 men) were
subjected to terrible
torture in prison. They were put into cells, and water was left to drip
on
their heads, together with other tortures that the satanic genius
of the Serbs
could devise, yet NO ONE BETRAYED ANYTHING.
How much
we were intimidated by these
tortures can be seen from the fact that at evening roll-call we
continued to
answer with the Bulgarian 'az' (I), instead of the Serbian 'ya'. The
Serbian
(Commanders) were enraged, but we went on doing it nevertheless. On
marching
out to drill from the barracks, towards Stanovlyansko Pole out of town,
we
always sang Bulgarian marching songs, including 'He Is Alive, He Is
Still
Alive' and 'The Quiet White Danube' without fail. The children in the
streets,
and on the balconies, would call their parents to hear 'the Bulgarians
sing'.
They
introduced the study of religion at
the barracks, taught by priests; evidently, they were trying to
influence us
through the church.
The
declaration of the First World War
finally put an end to these trials.
OUR
REGIMENT WAS DISBANDED. Our rifles
were taken away, packed in their original crates, and sent somewhere by
train.
We, the soldiers, were sent on, in battalions, GUARDED LIKE PRISONERS
OF WAR BY
ARMED SERBIAN TROOPS, to the following towns: our 2nd Battalion to the town of
On
arriving in Krushevac, we were
immediately marched to the barracks. In front of them, there were
newly-mobilized Serbian reservists. They fell into ranks, and so did
we. Two by
two, we were taken out of our ranks, and were mixed with ten Serbs.
Thus, we
lost our comrades in various units. The Serbs did not trust us to leave
us by
ourselves. After we were mixed in this manner, we were issued rifles
and
bullets in the cartridge-belts, for the first time ever (while in
Kraguevac, we
were never issued bullets for the cartridge belts. During shooting
practice,
the corporals would give us a bullet at a time, and after shooting it,
we would
have to return the cartridge in order to receive another one).
From
Krushevac, we left for the front lines,
in the direction of Shabats. A new page was opened there, with new
trials,
which are the subject of another tale.
THE WAR
DIVERTED PUBLIC ATTENTION FROM THE
EVENT IN KRAGUEVAC, IT HID IT FOR THE TIME BEING, YET IT HAS REMAINED A
HISTORICAL FACT.
The
following conscripts from St Nikole
took part in the mutiny: Stoyan Manev, Stoyko Aleksiev Zabuhchiiski, Hristofor Veselinov, Vlade Baba-Dostin, Yordan Yosifov, Iliya Ordev, Tasse Panev, Vane Boikovski, Gyoshe Chakurov, Pane H. Nemanichki, Tode Sarchievski and Konstantin G. Angelov (the author of these recollections).
Of the
above-mentioned conscripts, Iliya
Ordev died in the town of
The part
played by
The fate
of the treaty of San Stefano is
familiar. The principality of
On the
14th of the same month, I was in
Kichevo and, in the evening when I returned to the
That same
Sunday, early in the morning,
the priest Theodor had been
invited by a woman, a relative of his, to read prayers
to her in church after the service. He went to the church of the Holy
Virgin at
the cemetery and read prayers to this woman, but inside the church
there were
many other women. Priest Ioakim heard about the prayers that priest Theodor
had
read and he
reported him to the captain for reading in Bulgarian. The captain
immediately
sent soldiers, who brought the priest to his office and he beat him
mercilessly; after that he called the women who had been in the church
when he
had read the prayers and questioned all of them as to whether he had
read in
Bulgarian or in Greek. All women said that he had read in Greek and not
in
Bulgarian. After the captain found out that it had all been the result
of
intrigue and hatred, he held the priest in custody for three hours and
then let
him go.
I inform
you about it, Your Grace, and
remain with deep respect towards Your Grace.
Not long
after I had come back from my
trip, towards the middle of August, Damyan Grouev came to my surgery.
He had
recently come in Soloun during the summer as a substitute for Nikola
Naoumov,
later the editor of the newspaper 'Pravo', and had become a proofreader
in
Semerdjiev's book shop. He had come to me for medical treatment as he
had
eczema on his left ear. On this occasion, we spoke about my patients,
what kind
of people visited me, and we passed on to the problems of the
Exarchate, then
to general questions. It transpired that we had many things in common.
After a
week, Grouev again came to see me, using as a pretext his ailment,
which was
already clearing up. And again he spoke about public questions. I was
more
definite, but he, on the contrary, was deliberately restrained; it was
obvious
that he was hiding something which could be deduced from his words, but
he had
not mustered courage enough to speak openly about it. I must say that
the very
first time I saw him I noticed the sly smile which accompanied his
question as
to whether I had much work or not. In general, his tactics of cunningly
working
his way to his aim from afar, even when there was no need for this, as
in my
case, did not impress me favourably and even made me cold towards him.
At our
second meeting I told him that my decision to come to
At this
meeting,
we did not work out any formalities, such as taking an oath or anything
else of
the sort, to make the members consider themselves personally
obliged to work
for the cause. But we parted convinced that a serious and difficult
task was
facing us in the future. We decided to work jointly among our friends
and each
of us tried to take advantage of the sojourn in Soloun of teachers,
artisans,
priests and merchants coming from the provinces in order to propagate
our ideas
among them. Thus we proceeded up till the end of 1893.At the beginning of 1894, during the holidays, the
above-mentioned six people met again before Epiphany in the room of
Andon Dimitrov
(opposite the house of brothers Damyanov, a former Bulgarian
guest-house) in
order to lay the foundations of a revolutionary organization. We
discussed the
aims of this organization at length and later we settled on the
autonomy of
Mr.
Chairman,
The
Manifesto, in which the
Dutch-Scandinavian Committee submits to the world its formula for the
attainment of peace, deeply affects the destiny of the Bulgarians in
One of the
foundations of the afore-said
manifesto is the formula adopted from the Russian Revolution: peace
without
annexations, but with the right of the peoples to self-determination.
However,
to our great regret and astonishment, the afore-said Committee has
proposed a
solution to the Balkan conflicts which completely runs counter to the
foundations already laid. Thus it proposes the restoration of
The
century-long sufferings of our land in
the remote and recent past, its present, and the need to establish
conditions
conducive to a lasting peace - all this raises a loud voice of
protest against a solution which
is fraught with new trials and sacrifices for our people. The
Macedonian land
has been, is, and should remain nationally and politically undivided
from the
rest of the Bulgarian lands. It has this right by virtue of its past as
the
cradle of Bulgarian enlightenment in times of yore, and, in modern
times, by
virtue of its epic struggles for the establishment and maintenance of a
powerful Bulgarian state which would include all the lands inhabited by
Bulgarians within its borders. In former times,
In more
recent times, it was again in
Macedonia that the revival of the Bulgarian people began: it was here
that the
first spark was kindled to awaken the Bulgarians - Paissi's Bulgarian History (1762); it was here that
the first
Bulgarian books were written in a purely Bulgarian language by Hadji
Yoakim
Kurchovski of the town of Kichevo (1816) and by Kiril
Peichinovich from Tetovets (1817).
It was
here that
the first Bulgarian printing shop was opened in 1838 by the archimandrite Hadji
Theodosi (of
Doiran), first in the village of Vatosha, Tikvesh district, and later
in
Soloun; it was the birthplace of the first Bulgarian pedagogue, Neofit
Rilski
of Bansko, and of the first collection of folk songs, by the Miladinov
brothers
of Strouga. The Macedonian Bulgarians were also the first to raise the
ecclesiastic issue of the restoration of the old independent
Bulgarian church,
and that, precisely in
The
militant spirit of the Macedonian
Bulgarians has also found expression in a series of dangerous
struggles of a
political nature, in which they, with their suffering and blood,
brilliantly
cemented their unity with the Bulgarian people from the other parts of
the
common Bulgarian homeland. During the two conquests - under Byzantine and under
Turkish rule - the
Bulgarians in these parts, no less than the rest of their brethren, put
up both
passive and armed resistance to the foreign political power up to the
attainment of freedom and unification. Thus, in the 11th century, the Macedonian
Bulgarians, headed by Tsar Samuil’s grandson, Peter Delyan, and
centered in
Skopje, rose up in arms, defeated and drove out the Byzantine forces
and
re-established their own rule. In the 19th and the 20th centuries, the
revolutionary movements of the Macedonian Bulgarians wrote a great
blood-soaked
page in the history of Europe and have become well-known to European
diplomacy
and European public opinion: the Kresna Uprising broke out in 1878; the Ohrid and Prilep
Conspiracies were discovered in 1881 and 1882, respectively, and from 1895, up to the outbreak of the
Balkan War, Macedonia was the theatre of constant and systematically
organized
revolutionary movements which produced innumerable selfless heroes
in every
village and town, like Delchev of Koukoush, Grouevof Smilevo village
(Bitolya
district), Boris Sarafov of Nevrokop, Chekalarov of Kostour district, Apostol
Voivoda of
Enidje district, Ivan Karasoulski of Gevgeli district, Ouzounov of
Ohrid,
Sougarev of Bitolya, P. Toshev of Prilep, Razvigorov of Shtip,
Popyordanov of
Veles, Vassil Adja-larski of Skopje and thousands upon thousands of
fighters,
both dead, and living.
Most
prominent among these rebel movements
was that of 1903, which
embraced all Macedonia, and which was most powerful in Macedonia's
western
parts - in the districts
of Bitolya,
Ohrid, Resen, Lerin, Kostour, Prilep, Kroushevo
and Kichevo - precisely the
places which the
Dutch-Scandinavian Committee is condemning to the Serbs' alien, and
therefore
cruel, regime. The long and persistent revolutionary struggles in which
The
Macedonian Bulgarians' revolutionary
struggle for freedom continued even during the three-year rule of
the Serbs in
Thanks to
such efforts and struggles by
the Bulgarian people, its rights and ethnic borders have come to be
recognized
by the international authorities of the whole of
Among
these acts, suffice it to mention
the following:
1. The Turkish
government's Firman (decree)
on the establishment of the Bulgarian Exarchate of 1872.
2. The Constantinople
European Conference of 1876, which included
3. The San Stefano
Treaty of 1878, under which the
whole of
4. The Murzsteg
Programme on reforms in the
lands where the great uprising of 1903 occurred.
Among the
admissions on the part of our
enemies, the Serbs, we shall mention:
1. All Serbian
literature from
2. The Serbian
people's and the Serbian
government's acquiescence in the setting up of the Bulgarian
Exarchate
and the new Western Bulgarian region, as proposed by the Constantinople European Conference, with that region
covering all of Macedonia as well;
3. The 1867 Protocol, approved by the
Serbian government and by the Bulgarian Revolutionary Committee of that
time,
under which protocol
4. The Serbian
Socialist Party's latest
memorandum to the Dutch-Scandinavian Committee, which unequivocally
recognizes
the fact that the nucleus of the Serbian people lies between the
From what
has been said hitherto, it is evident that
the
Dutch-Scandinavian Committee is cutting off parts of the living body of
the
Bulgarian people, and is thus running counter not only to the natural
and
traditional ideals and struggles of the Bulgarian people for freedom
and unification,
but also to the unbiased acts of state by official Europe, official
Turkey, and
even official Serbia; thus the Committee has abandoned its sound status
of a
moral international organization and has assumed the role of a
corps
diplomatique which divides the peoples regardless of their right to
self-determination.
Nor does
the Dutch-Scandinavian Committee
confine itself only to this error: in its desire to please
The lands
on both sides of the Vardar, and
the
The
sensible and real use of the
The
undersigned, inspired by these ideas,
on behalf of the Bulgarian population in
Dime
Nikolov of Skopje, an old man of 86; studied under the teacher
Ignatii of Veles at the Bulgarian school in the town of Skopje in 1845; the leading master of the
tanners' guild in Skopje for many years and a most active participant
in the
struggle for the establishment of an independent Bulgarian church.
Traiche
Chaicharov of Skopje, an old man of 76, studied at the Bulgarian school
in Skopje between 1853
and 1860 under the teachers Ignatii of
Veles, Hadji Yordan Konstantinov Djino of Veles and the teacher
Stoyanche
Rostov of Vranya; a co-founder of the Bulgarian library club Razvitie
(Progress)
in Skopje in 1873,
and
Chairman of the same for three years.
Petroush
Shagmanov of Skopje, an old man of 66; member of the Bulgarian Church
Commune in Skopje in 1873, a relative of Metropolitan
Nathanail, the eminent Bulgarian
participant in the church struggle, a writer and the first Bulgarian
Metropolitan of Ohrid, immediately following the establishment of
the
Bulgarian Exarchate (1872).
Spiro
G. Gaidardjiev of Skopje, 22, a member of the Skopje Local
Bulgarian Revolutionary Committee; sentenced and jailed six times for
his
revolutionary activities.
Kralyo
Hadji Markov of Skopje, an old man of 78, studied in 1848-50 at the Bulgarian
school in
Skopje under the teachers Ignatii of Veles and Stefan Shosholchev of
Skopje;
for many years a member of the Bulgarian Church Commune and the
school's board
of trustees; a participant in the struggles for th establishment of an
independent Bulgarian church.
Lazo
Velkov of Divlya village, Skopje
district, a
Bulgarian public figure in Skopje for many years; the voivoda of a
Bulgarian
revolutionary armed detachment in the Skopje area during the
Serbian regime in
Macedonia (1913-15),
whose
detachment fought against the Serbian forces on several occasions.
Hadji
Zafir Tasev of Koumanovo, an old man of 70; attended a Bulgarian school in
Koumanovo in 1860 under the
Bulgarian teacher Simeon Momchedjikov; active in church affairs in
Koumanovo
over many years.
Mihail
S. Bailovski of Koumanovo, an old man of 77; studied at the Bulgarian school
in Koumanovo in 1856-58
under
the teacher Father Stefan Bailovski, for many years active over the
Bulgarian
church question and school affairs.
Krusto
Lazarov of Koumanovo, a Bulgarian revolutionary
voivoda in Koumanovo for many years; a participant in the great Bitolya
Uprising in 1903; a Bulgarian
armed revolutionary and during the Serbian regime (1913-15) the voivoda of a
detachment
which fought several battles with Serbian troops in the Koumanovo area.
The
priest Dimiter Davidov of Krivorechna
Palanka, an
old man of 70; attended
the Bulgarian school in Krivorechna Palanka in 1855 under teacher H. P. Andonov;
himself a
teacher in Krivorechna Palanka in 1864; member for many years of the
Bulgarian
Church Commune in that town and a participant in the struggles over the
Bulgarian Church question.
Vesselin
Popgeorgiev (Ikonomov) of
Krivorechna Palanka, participant in the Bulgarian
revolutionary struggle in Macedonia;
son of priest Georgi Ikonomov, who was a delegate from the Skopje
diocese to
the first Bulgarian All-People's Constituent Assembly in Constantinople
(1872) for the setting up
of the
Exarchate - the
independent Bulgarian church.
Argir
Manasiev of Gevgeli, a Bulgarian revolutionary
voivoda of a rebel detachment in the Gevgeli district; a participant in
the
great Macedonian Uprising (1903).
Doncho
Angelov of Kratovo, a Bulgarian revolutionary
district voivoda of a rebel detachment in the Kratovo area; a
participant in
many battles.
Arso
Lazarov of Stip, an old man of 70; attended a Bulgarian school in
Shtip in 1854; formerly
active in church and school affairs in Shtip; active in revolutionary
affairs
in Macedonia and brother of Todor Lazarov, the late eminent
Bulgarian
revolutionary in Macedonia.
Efrem
Chouchkov of Shtip, one of the first leaders of the
local Bulgarian revolutionary organization; a voivoda of many years
standing in
the Shtip, Maleshevtsi, and Kochen areas; a
participant in the great
Macedonian Uprising of 1903.
Arsenii
Kostentsev of Shtip, an old man of 75, a Bulgarian travelling
bookseller
in Shtip and the surrounding towns in 1866, a Bulgarian people's teacher in
various
towns of Macedonia since 1862.
Hadji
Ivan Vessov of Veles, an old man of 74; merchant, a leading local
participant in the struggle for an independent Bulgarian church.
Ivan
Korabarov of Veles, an old man of 70; active in the struggles over
the Bulgarian church question and school affairs in Veles.
Traiko
Gochev of Veles, a long-standing member of the
governing body of the local revolutionary organization; formerly exiled
to the
Dimko
Krepiev of Veles, a long-standing member and
leader of the Bulgarian revolutionary cause in Veles; grandson of the
late
eminent participant in the church question Gyosho Krepiev.
M. K.
Tsepenkov of Prilep, an old man of 88, a Bulgarian book-seller in
Prilep in 1862, actively
involved in the church struggles, and known in Bulgarian literature as
a
student of folklore -
a
collector of Bulgarian folk songs, tales, proverbs, etc., from
Prilep and the district.
Peter
Atsev of Prilep,
a Bulgarian
revolutionary, voivoda in the Prilep area for many
years, a participant as a voivoda in the great Macedonian Uprising of 1903 and member of the Bulgarian
Revolutionary
Committee in Bitolya in 1908
K. N. Nebrekliev of
Prilep, an old man of 66; active on behalf of the
people
in the church struggle; revitalizer of the Bulgarian library club, Nadezhda
(Hope),
in Prilep, founded back in 1868, and its treasurer in 1874.
A. H.
Yanov of Prilep, an old man of 62, one of the revitalizers of the
Bulgarian library club Nadezhda (1874) and its secretary
already in 1874.
Dimiter
G. Velianov of Kroushevo, founder of the Bulgarian
Revolutionary Committee in Kroushevo in 1894; a prisoner in Turkish jails for
his
participation in revolutionary affairs.
Grigor
D. Bozhinov of Kroushevo, a long-standing member of the
governing body of the local Bulgarian revolutionary organization;
member of
the Provisional Bulgarian Revolutionary Administration in Kroushevo
during the
great Macedonian Uprising of 1903, while the town was held by the
rebels.
Mihail
I. Stanoev of Kroushevo, a long-standing member of the
Bulgarian Revolutionary Committee in Kroushevo and participant in the
great
Macedonian Uprising of 1903 as a member of an armed
detachment.
Andrea
D. Tatarchev of Resen, an old man of-88; a meinber of the Bulgarian
Church and School Commune in Resen for many years, ever since 1864 - long before the
establishment
of the Bulgarian Exarchate; active in the struggle for an independent
Bulgarian
church -
Exarchate;
Evtim
T. Lyapchev of Resen, an old man of 65; studied in the Bulgarian school
in Resen in 1873 under the
teacher Zahari Chintoulov; brother of the former Bulgarian minister,
Adrea
Lyapchev, and of the Bulgarian revolutionary, Nikola Lyapchev, murdered
in
prison during the great Bitolya Uprising (1903).
Krusto
Traikov of Krushe village, Resen
district, a
Bulgarian revolutionary voivoda in the Resen area for many years;
participant
in the great Bitolya Uprising of 1903, and afterwards, during the
Serbian regime
in
Hadji
Seraflm Apostolov of Teartsi
village, Tetovo district, a birthplace of Kiril
Peichinovich, the eminent Bulgarian public
figure, enlightener and writer at the beginning of the 19th century; an
old man
of 70, who attended a
Bulgarian school
in the neighbouring village of Leshok in 1855; a former longstanding
member of the
Church and School board of trustees in Teartsi.
Nasto
Iliev of Tetovo, an old man of 80, who attended a Bulgarian school
in Tetovo in 1849 under the
teachers Nahum Ivanov of Tetovo and Gyore Stoev of Zhilche village,
Tetovo
district; a long-standing trustee of the Bulgarian church in Tetovo.
Hadji
Grigor
Hadji Seraflmov of Tetovo, an old man of 72; attended the Bulgarian school
in Tetovo in 1858;
a
church and school trustee in
the same town for many years; son of Hadji Serafim Hadji Nahumov, a
prominent
participant in the church struggles in Tetovo.
Mladen
Talyov of Tetovo, an old man of 70; grandson of one of the sons of
the priest Yakov Suzdanov, who was a Bulgarian priest and teacher in
Tetovo
back in 1836-38; himself
a school and church trustee for many years, while his son, Mihail
Mladenov,
died in Rhodes in 1904,
where
he
was exiled for his participation in Bulgarian revolutionary affairs.
Mladen
Mishev of Tetovo, member of the governing body of
the local Bulgarian revolutionary committee for the past 11 years.
Rafail
Stolev of Vrapchishta village
Gostivar district, an old man of 70; participant in the church
struggles for the establishment of an
independent Bulgarian church in
Nestor
Trayanov of Galichnik, an old man of 76; icon painter for 55 years, during which time he
decorated many Bulgarian churches in Macedonia; son of another famous
icon
painter, Trayan Negriev of Galichnik.
P. S.
Hadjievski of Galichnik, nephew of Hadji Parteni of
Zograf, the famous Bulgarian writer and first Bulgarian Metropolitan of
Pirot — immediately
after the
establishment of the Bulgarian Exarchate in
Trupko
I. Ginovski of Galichnik, an old man of 68, nephew of the teacher Kruste
Petrov Ginovski,
who back in 1840 was a
Bulgarian teacher in Galichnik; Trupko Ginovski's son, Ivan, was killed
as a
participant in the Bulgarian revolutionary struggle for liberation.
A.
Hristov of Galichnik, an icon painter; a descendant
of the Furtov family of famous painters, who for more than 200 years have decorated Bulgarian
churches in Macedonia, Moesia and Thrace with mural paintings,
wood-carving and
sculpture; the same was the chief leader of the local revolutionary
committee
during the great uprising of 1903.
Ikon T.
Simonovski of Debur, an old man of 65, a Bulgarian priest in this town
ever since 1875; studied
under the Bulgarian teacher Hadji Teofil in Debur in 1867; an eminent participant in
public and church affairs in Debur.
Dimiter
T. Kounovski of Debur, an old man of 81, who studied in Debur under the
Bulgarian teacher Yosif Gyurov Kounovski; a former church and school
trustee in
Debur for many years; worker in Constantinople at the time of the
establishment
of the independent Bulgarian church.
H.
Atanasov, born in Pasenki village,
Debur district, district
leader of the Debur Revolutionary Committee for four years, as well as
during
the great Macedonian Uprising of 1903.
Angel
Sprostranov of Ohrid, an old man of 90; a participant in the Ohrid
Bulgarian revolutionary liberation conspiracy of 1881, for which he spent five years
in jail.
Stanislav
G. Chakurov of Strouga,
member of the local
Bulgarian revolutionary committee and son of Georgi Chakurov, an
eminent
Bulgarian public figure in Strouga, an associate of the Bulgarian
public
figures and writers, the Miladinov brothers of Strouga, and a Bulgarian
deputy
to Mithad Pasha's Ottoman Parliament in Constantinople in 1876.
Anastas
N. Kalaidjiev, an old man of 80, a pupil of Dimiter Miladinov; a
Bulgarian teacher in Strouga as early as 1868, and a singer in the Bulgarian
church in
Strouga ever since that year.
The
Archpriest H. Malenkov of Ohrid, an old man of 76, a Bulgarian priest in Ohrid
ever since 1866; ex-chairman
of the Bulgarian church Commune, from 1870 to 1890; a former participant in the
struggle for
the establishment of an independent Bulgarian church - the Exarchate.
Anastas
Lozanchev of Bitolya, Chairman of the Bitolya
revolutionary district, member of the General Staff of the great
Uprising of 1903.
Georgi
Grouev of Smilevo village, Bitolya
district, a
participant in the great Macedonian Uprising and brother of Damyan
Grouev,
Chief of the rebel General Staff in that uprising and one of the
founders of
the Bulgarian Revolutionary Organization in Macedonia.
Nake
Yanev of Lahchani village, Kichevo
district, a
voivoda in the Kichevo area for many years and a participant in the
great
Macedonian Uprising of 1903 as a voivoda of the rebels in
the Kichevo district.1